PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDTY vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDTY vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDTY achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.75% return.


SDTY

1D
0.51%
1M
1.41%
6M
7.09%
YTD
9.06%
1Y
19.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.88%

WNTR

1D
3.26%
1M
8.13%
6M
14.92%
YTD
10.75%
1Y
107.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
47.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$462.73K$438.52K$552.67K
$4.02M$3.86M$3.95M

SDTY vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SDTY and WNTR is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDTY vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDTY
SDTY Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDTY vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDTYWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.71

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

6.87

+1.99

SDTY vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDTY and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDTY vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDTY drawdown since its inception was -18.63%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDTY and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDTYWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.63%

-42.65%

+24.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

-42.65%

+34.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-9.64%

+9.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-20.18%

+17.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

16.81%

-14.80%

Volatility

SDTY vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) is 3.47%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that SDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDTYWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

14.85%

-11.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

47.43%

-38.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

54.68%

-42.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

53.42%

-36.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

53.42%

-36.95%

SDTY vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDTY vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

SDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.19%, less than WNTR's 107.02% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SDTY and WNTR have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to SDTY (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDTY dropped -18.63% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 107.38% vs 19.68% for SDTY. On fees, WNTR is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, SDTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 107.38% return vs 19.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WNTR is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SDTY.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 27.19% for SDTY.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SDTY and 1.00% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDTY and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer