SDTY vs. TSYY
SDTY (YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SDTY returned 21.67% vs -5.48% for TSYY. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDTY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSYY.
Performance
SDTY vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDTY achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly higher than TSYY's -17.16% return.
SDTY
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 21.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- YTD
- -17.16%
- 6M
- -17.01%
- 1Y
- -5.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDTY vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SDTY YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 6.19% | 9.67% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -17.16% | -22.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDTY and TSYY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.52 |
The correlation between SDTY and TSYY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDTY vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank
SDTY
TSYY
SDTY vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDTY | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.00 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | -0.19 | +2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.38 | -0.37 | +11.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDTY | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | -0.18 | +2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | -0.59 | +1.32 |
Drawdowns
SDTY vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDTY drawdown since its inception was -18.63%, smaller than the maximum TSYY drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDTY and TSYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDTY | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.63% | -41.52% | +22.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -28.39% | +20.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -37.12% | +34.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.02% | -25.98% | +22.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 14.71% | -12.80% |
Volatility
SDTY vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) is 3.44%, while GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that SDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDTY | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 6.01% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | 19.90% | -11.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.23% | 31.52% | -20.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 37.51% | -20.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 37.51% | -20.66% |
SDTY vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than TSYY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDTY vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison
SDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.00%, less than TSYY's 278.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SDTY YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 26.00% | 22.00% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 278.11% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDTY and TSYY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSYY has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to SDTY (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDTY dropped -18.63% vs TSYY's -41.52%.
On 1-year performance, SDTY leads with 21.67% vs -5.48% for TSYY. On fees, TSYY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, SDTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SDTY has performed better with a 21.67% return vs -5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSYY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SDTY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 278.11%, compared with 26.00% for SDTY.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SDTY and 0.99% for TSYY.
SDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDTY and TSYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer