PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDTY vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDTY vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDTY achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 12.87% return.


SDTY

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.07%
6M
6.33%
YTD
7.95%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.36%

QQQY

1D
-0.07%
1M
-4.79%
6M
11.42%
YTD
12.87%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDTY vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SDTY and QQQY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

0.83

The correlation between SDTY and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDTY vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDTY
SDTY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDTY vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDTYQQQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

1.97

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.97

7.58

+1.39

SDTY vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDTY and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDTY vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDTY drawdown since its inception was -18.63%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQY drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDTY and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDTYQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.63%

-19.05%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

-11.14%

+3.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-5.55%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-2.92%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.89%

-0.89%

Volatility

SDTY vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) is 3.00%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that SDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDTYQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

7.08%

-4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

14.66%

-5.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

16.75%

-5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.51%

15.57%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

15.57%

+0.94%

SDTY vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDTY vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

SDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.94%, less than QQQY's 37.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
37.35%45.34%83.34%20.64%
SDTY
YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
26.94%22.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDTY and QQQY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQY has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to SDTY (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDTY dropped -18.63% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 21.87% vs 17.90% for SDTY. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, SDTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 21.87% return vs 17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SDTY.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 37.35%, compared with 26.94% for SDTY.

SDTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SDTY and 0.99% for QQQY.

SDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDTY and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer