PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDSCX vs. DIBRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDSCX vs. DIBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (SDSCX) and BNY Mellon International Bond Fund (DIBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDSCX achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly higher than DIBRX's -0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SDSCX has outperformed DIBRX with an annualized return of 11.46%, while DIBRX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.30% annualized return.


SDSCX

1D
-1.88%
1M
0.13%
YTD
4.92%
6M
3.54%
1Y
18.23%
3Y*
11.92%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
11.46%

DIBRX

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
-0.72%
6M
0.12%
1Y
-0.30%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
-2.68%
10Y*
-0.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDSCX vs. DIBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDSCX
BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.92%11.91%9.95%15.55%-33.20%-4.42%68.54%39.14%-1.46%26.74%
DIBRX
BNY Mellon International Bond Fund
-0.72%8.51%-3.14%5.70%-16.81%-6.80%8.38%5.16%-5.80%12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SDSCX and DIBRX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.12

Over the past year, SDSCX and DIBRX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDSCX vs. DIBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDSCX
SDSCX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SDSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SDSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

DIBRX
DIBRX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DIBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DIBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDSCX vs. DIBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (SDSCX) and BNY Mellon International Bond Fund (DIBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDSCXDIBRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.05

+0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

0.12

+1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.01

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

0.07

+0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.08

0.18

+2.90

SDSCX vs. DIBRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDSCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the DIBRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDSCX and DIBRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDSCXDIBRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.05

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.36

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

-0.04

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.44

-0.43

Drawdowns

SDSCX vs. DIBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDSCX drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than DIBRX's maximum drawdown of -30.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDSCX and DIBRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDSCXDIBRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.89%

-30.62%

-68.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.60%

-5.21%

-14.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-8.76%

-16.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.77%

-28.69%

-17.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.25%

-30.62%

-17.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.87%

-15.10%

-67.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.82%

-7.20%

-66.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.04%

2.15%

+3.89%

Volatility

SDSCX vs. DIBRX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (SDSCX) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to BNY Mellon International Bond Fund (DIBRX) at 1.90%. This indicates that SDSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDSCXDIBRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

1.90%

+4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.35%

4.91%

+11.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.07%

6.68%

+14.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.51%

7.43%

+17.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.27%

7.14%

+17.13%

SDSCX vs. DIBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDSCX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than DIBRX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDSCX vs. DIBRX - Dividend Comparison

SDSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.84%, more than DIBRX's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIBRX
BNY Mellon International Bond Fund
3.12%2.48%2.34%0.00%0.58%1.90%2.16%0.00%3.64%3.81%0.61%5.14%
SDSCX
BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
49.84%52.29%0.43%0.00%0.00%9.19%7.93%0.00%8.72%9.16%2.21%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDSCX and DIBRX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDSCX has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to DIBRX (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDSCX dropped -98.89% vs DIBRX's -30.62%.

SDSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDSCX and DIBRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer