SDSCX vs. TMCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (SDSCX) and Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX).
SDSCX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Jan 4, 1988. TMCPX is managed by Touchstone. It was launched on Jan 2, 2003.
Performance
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDSCX BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | -8.34% | 11.91% | 9.95% | 15.55% | -33.20% | -4.42% | 68.54% | 39.14% | -1.46% | 26.74% |
TMCPX Touchstone Mid Cap Fund | -7.96% | 4.87% | 8.48% | 27.48% | -15.62% | 15.21% | 12.56% | 39.44% | -3.14% | 20.23% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SDSCX having a -8.34% return and TMCPX slightly higher at -7.96%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SDSCX having a 10.40% annualized return and TMCPX not far behind at 10.15%.
SDSCX
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -13.86%
- YTD
- -8.34%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- -2.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
TMCPX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -11.26%
- YTD
- -7.96%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- 0.87%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDSCX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than TMCPX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SDSCX vs. TMCPX — Risk / Return Rank
SDSCX
TMCPX
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (SDSCX) and Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDSCX | TMCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 0.09 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 0.28 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.03 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | -0.01 | +0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | -0.03 | +1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDSCX | TMCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 0.09 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.24 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.55 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.47 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between SDSCX and TMCPX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Dividend Comparison
SDSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.04%, more than TMCPX's 2.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDSCX BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 57.04% | 52.29% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.19% | 7.93% | 0.00% | 8.72% | 9.16% | 2.21% | 6.57% |
TMCPX Touchstone Mid Cap Fund | 2.39% | 2.20% | 2.52% | 0.92% | 1.43% | 2.80% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 3.95% | 1.10% | 0.58% | 0.06% |
Drawdowns
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDSCX drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, which is greater than TMCPX's maximum drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDSCX and TMCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDSCX | TMCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.19% | -58.03% | -41.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.60% | -13.48% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.77% | -21.47% | -24.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.25% | -35.54% | -12.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.05% | -13.48% | -75.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.09% | -9.64% | -65.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.97% | 4.15% | +0.82% |
Volatility
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (SDSCX) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX) at 5.60%. This indicates that SDSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SDSCX | TMCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.72% | 5.60% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 11.66% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.39% | 19.65% | +4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.49% | 17.63% | +6.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 18.39% | +5.73% |