SDSCX vs. TMCPX
SDSCX (BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) and TMCPX (Touchstone Mid Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - SDSCX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Dreyfus, while TMCPX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Touchstone. Over the past 10 years, SDSCX returned 12.24%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for TMCPX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDSCX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for TMCPX.
Performance
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDSCX achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly higher than TMCPX's 1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SDSCX has outperformed TMCPX with an annualized return of 12.24%, while TMCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.97% annualized return.
SDSCX
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 22.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
TMCPX
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 9.38%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDSCX BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 11.99% | 11.91% | 9.95% | 15.55% | -33.20% | -4.42% | 68.54% | 39.14% | -1.46% | 26.74% |
TMCPX Touchstone Mid Cap Fund | 1.66% | 4.87% | 8.48% | 27.48% | -15.62% | 15.21% | 12.56% | 39.44% | -3.14% | 20.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDSCX and TMCPX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2003 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SDSCX and TMCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDSCX vs. TMCPX — Risk / Return Rank
SDSCX
TMCPX
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (SDSCX) and Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDSCX | TMCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.11 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 0.70 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 1.86 | +1.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDSCX drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than TMCPX's maximum drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDSCX and TMCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDSCX | TMCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.89% | -58.03% | -40.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.60% | -13.48% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -21.47% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.77% | -21.47% | -24.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.25% | -35.54% | -12.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.71% | -4.44% | -77.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.83% | -9.61% | -64.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.24% | 5.11% | +1.13% |
Volatility
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (SDSCX) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Touchstone Mid Cap Fund (TMCPX) at 5.20%. This indicates that SDSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDSCX | TMCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 5.20% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.08% | 13.26% | +3.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.78% | 16.80% | +4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 17.94% | +6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 18.54% | +5.79% |
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDSCX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than TMCPX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDSCX vs. TMCPX - Dividend Comparison
SDSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.69%, more than TMCPX's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDSCX BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund | 46.69% | 52.29% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.19% | 7.93% | 0.00% | 8.72% | 9.16% | 2.21% | 6.57% |
TMCPX Touchstone Mid Cap Fund | 2.17% | 2.20% | 2.52% | 0.92% | 1.43% | 2.80% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 3.95% | 1.10% | 0.58% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDSCX and TMCPX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDSCX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to TMCPX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDSCX dropped -98.89% vs TMCPX's -58.03%.
SDSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDSCX and TMCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer