DIBRX vs. DRLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon International Bond Fund (DIBRX) and BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX).
DIBRX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Dec 29, 2005. DRLIX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006.
Performance
DIBRX vs. DRLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DIBRX vs. DRLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIBRX BNY Mellon International Bond Fund | -3.38% | 8.51% | -3.14% | 5.70% | -16.81% | -6.80% | 8.38% | 5.16% | -5.80% | 12.58% |
DRLIX BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund | 0.47% | 9.12% | 3.21% | 11.35% | -23.24% | 26.95% | -2.30% | 23.05% | -4.57% | 11.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIBRX achieves a -3.38% return, which is significantly lower than DRLIX's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, DIBRX has underperformed DRLIX with an annualized return of -0.36%, while DRLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.55% annualized return.
DIBRX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- YTD
- -3.38%
- 6M
- -3.78%
- 1Y
- 2.02%
- 3Y*
- 1.68%
- 5Y*
- -2.59%
- 10Y*
- -0.36%
DRLIX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DIBRX vs. DRLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIBRX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than DRLIX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DIBRX vs. DRLIX — Risk / Return Rank
DIBRX
DRLIX
DIBRX vs. DRLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Bond Fund (DIBRX) and BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIBRX | DRLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 0.62 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.44 | 0.92 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.13 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 0.79 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.34 | 3.04 | -1.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIBRX | DRLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 0.62 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | 0.19 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.26 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.16 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between DIBRX and DRLIX is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DIBRX vs. DRLIX - Dividend Comparison
DIBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than DRLIX's 3.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIBRX BNY Mellon International Bond Fund | 2.57% | 2.48% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 1.90% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 3.64% | 3.81% | 0.61% | 5.14% |
DRLIX BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund | 3.09% | 3.11% | 2.08% | 1.70% | 7.68% | 8.25% | 1.47% | 11.17% | 4.63% | 4.72% | 5.73% | 5.40% |
Drawdowns
DIBRX vs. DRLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIBRX drawdown since its inception was -30.62%, smaller than the maximum DRLIX drawdown of -68.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIBRX and DRLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIBRX | DRLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.62% | -68.86% | +38.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.21% | -10.46% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.69% | -31.86% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.62% | -41.82% | +11.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.38% | -9.70% | -7.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -14.46% | +7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 2.72% | -0.85% |
Volatility
DIBRX vs. DRLIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon International Bond Fund (DIBRX) is 2.51%, while BNY Mellon Global Real Estate Securities Fund (DRLIX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that DIBRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DIBRX | DRLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | 4.27% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.22% | 8.00% | -3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.46% | 13.79% | -6.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.34% | 16.31% | -8.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.13% | 17.60% | -10.47% |