SDOW vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SDOW (ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SDOW is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. SDOW charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

SDOW vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDOW achieves a -20.41% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.

SDOW

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -6.58%
• YTD: -20.41%
• 6M: -18.40%
• 1Y: -43.24%
• 3Y*: -33.77%
• 5Y*: -25.99%
• 10Y*: -38.66%

LINT

• 1D: -12.86%
• 1M: 11.99%
• YTD: 744.89%
• 6M: 773.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDOW vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30	-20.41%	-11.47%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	744.89%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SDOW and LINT is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	-0.24

SDOW vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SDOW	LINT
Financial Services	83.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SDOW vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDOW

SDOW Risk / Return Rank: 1
SDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
SDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
SDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 0

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDOW vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SDOW	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.77	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.01	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.70	—	—

Drawdowns

SDOW vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDOW drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOW and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDOW	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.96%	-49.54%	-50.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-75.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.96%	-12.86%	-87.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.59%	-20.48%	-69.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.36%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SDOW	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.39%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.16%	168.83%	-131.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.43%	168.83%	-124.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.13%	168.83%	-116.70%

SDOW vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDOW vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

SDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than LINT's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.10%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30	5.85%	5.80%	8.30%	5.38%	0.36%	0.00%	0.52%	2.17%	1.23%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDOW and LINT in my portfolio?

SDOW and LINT have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SDOW or LINT?

On fees, SDOW is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDOW or LINT?

SDOW is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDOW or LINT?

SDOW has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.

What is the main difference between SDOW and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDOW and 0.97% for LINT.