SDOW vs. ARMG
SDOW (ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SDOW is passively managed, while ARMG is actively managed. Over the past year, SDOW returned -42.78% vs 507.81% for ARMG. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. SDOW charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.
Performance
SDOW vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOW achieves a -18.49% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 888.42% return.
SDOW
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -10.30%
- YTD
- -18.49%
- 6M
- -21.02%
- 1Y
- -42.78%
- 3Y*
- -33.02%
- 5Y*
- -25.27%
- 10Y*
- -38.16%
ARMG
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- 219.03%
- YTD
- 888.42%
- 6M
- 521.40%
- 1Y
- 507.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDOW vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 | -18.49% | -34.27% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 888.42% | -61.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOW and ARMG is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOW vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
SDOW
ARMG
SDOW vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDOW | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | 3.93 | -5.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | 3.63 | -5.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.46 | -0.66 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 7.63 | -8.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.58 | 13.49 | -15.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDOW | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.19 | 3.93 | -5.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.78 | 1.18 | -1.96 |
Drawdowns
SDOW vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOW drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than ARMG's maximum drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOW and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOW | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -80.28% | -19.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.45% | -68.13% | +24.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -3.36% | -96.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.43% | -53.19% | -36.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.35% | 38.55% | -11.20% |
Volatility
SDOW vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) is 8.83%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 66.04%. This indicates that SDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOW | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 66.04% | -57.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.90% | 103.87% | -75.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.02% | 130.25% | -94.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.26% | 138.46% | -94.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.13% | 138.46% | -86.33% |
SDOW vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOW vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
SDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than ARMG's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 0.49% | 4.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 | 5.71% | 5.80% | 8.30% | 5.38% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.17% | 1.23% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOW and ARMG have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARMG has higher volatility (66.04%) compared to SDOW (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOW dropped -99.96% vs ARMG's -80.28%.
On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 507.81% vs -42.78% for SDOW. On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SDOW has been the lower-risk option at 8.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 507.81% return vs -42.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SDOW.
SDOW has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 0.49% for ARMG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDOW and 0.75% for ARMG.
ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOW and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer