PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDMZX vs. VBISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDMZX vs. VBISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund (VBISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDMZX achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than VBISX's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SDMZX has outperformed VBISX with an annualized return of 3.15%, while VBISX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.


SDMZX

1D
-1.44%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.67%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
3.15%

VBISX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.59%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*
1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDMZX vs. VBISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDMZX
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund
1.15%6.18%5.64%6.25%-4.82%-0.19%3.97%7.92%0.95%3.96%
VBISX
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.26%5.67%3.66%4.54%-5.61%-1.35%4.63%4.78%1.27%1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SDMZX and VBISX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.66

The correlation between SDMZX and VBISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDMZX vs. VBISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDMZX
SDMZX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SDMZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDMZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDMZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SDMZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDMZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VBISX
VBISX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VBISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBISX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VBISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDMZX vs. VBISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund (VBISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDMZXVBISXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

1.59

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.74

2.67

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.32

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

2.57

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.74

8.32

+8.42

SDMZX vs. VBISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDMZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the VBISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDMZX and VBISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDMZXVBISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.59

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

0.48

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.23

0.75

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

1.34

-0.14

Drawdowns

SDMZX vs. VBISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDMZX drawdown since its inception was -9.76%, which is greater than VBISX's maximum drawdown of -8.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMZX and VBISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDMZXVBISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-8.79%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-1.54%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.44%

-1.55%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.51%

-8.72%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.76%

-8.79%

-0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-0.66%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.99%

-0.87%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

0.48%

-0.15%

Volatility

SDMZX vs. VBISX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund (VBISX) at 0.69%. This indicates that SDMZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDMZXVBISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

0.69%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

1.62%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13%

2.24%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.55%

2.94%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.58%

2.39%

+0.19%

SDMZX vs. VBISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDMZX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VBISX's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDMZX vs. VBISX - Dividend Comparison

SDMZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than VBISX's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDMZX
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund
4.69%4.62%4.57%3.36%4.70%2.76%3.10%6.18%3.47%2.64%2.76%3.34%
VBISX
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund
3.90%3.44%3.29%2.10%1.38%1.16%1.72%2.16%1.92%1.58%1.42%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDMZX and VBISX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDMZX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to VBISX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDMZX dropped -9.76% vs VBISX's -8.79%.

SDMZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDMZX and VBISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer