SDMZX vs. EIBAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SDMZX (PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund) and EIBAX (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - SDMZX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by PGIM, while EIBAX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, SDMZX returned 3.15%/yr vs 3.59%/yr for EIBAX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDMZX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EIBAX.

Performance

SDMZX vs. EIBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund (EIBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDMZX achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than EIBAX's 0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SDMZX has underperformed EIBAX with an annualized return of 3.15%, while EIBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.59% annualized return.

SDMZX

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.15%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 5.15%
• 3Y*: 5.84%
• 5Y*: 2.80%
• 10Y*: 3.15%

EIBAX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 0.71%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 6.00%
• 5Y*: 1.38%
• 10Y*: 3.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDMZX vs. EIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SDMZX PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund	1.15%	6.18%	5.64%	6.25%	-4.82%	-0.19%	3.97%	7.92%	0.95%	3.96%
EIBAX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund	0.51%	9.15%	4.38%	5.59%	-12.88%	3.02%	5.89%	10.84%	-0.84%	7.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SDMZX and EIBAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.68

The correlation between SDMZX and EIBAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SDMZX vs. EIBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDMZX

SDMZX Risk / Return Rank: 65
SDMZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SDMZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SDMZX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SDMZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SDMZX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

EIBAX

EIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 28
EIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
EIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
EIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
EIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDMZX vs. EIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund (EIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDMZX	EIBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.54	+0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	2.32	+0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.28	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	2.09	+1.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.74	6.56	+10.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDMZX vs. EIBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDMZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the EIBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDMZX and EIBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDMZX	EIBAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.54	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.10	0.26	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.23	0.77	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.81	+0.39

Drawdowns

SDMZX vs. EIBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDMZX drawdown since its inception was -9.76%, smaller than the maximum EIBAX drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMZX and EIBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDMZX	EIBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.76%	-17.20%	+7.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.44%	-3.26%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.44%	-5.65%	+4.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.51%	-16.91%	+8.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.76%	-17.20%	+7.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-1.41%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.99%	-3.51%	+2.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.33%	1.04%	-0.71%

Volatility

SDMZX vs. EIBAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund (EIBAX) at 1.54%. This indicates that SDMZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDMZX	EIBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	1.54%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.81%	3.10%	-0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.13%	4.09%	-0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.55%	5.32%	-2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.58%	4.70%	-2.12%

SDMZX vs. EIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDMZX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than EIBAX's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDMZX vs. EIBAX - Dividend Comparison

SDMZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than EIBAX's 5.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIBAX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund	5.14%	5.13%	5.58%	4.01%	4.04%	3.49%	3.87%	3.97%	4.16%	3.55%	3.90%	5.69%
SDMZX PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund	4.69%	4.62%	4.57%	3.36%	4.70%	2.76%	3.10%	6.18%	3.47%	2.64%	2.76%	3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDMZX and EIBAX in my portfolio?

SDMZX and EIBAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDMZX or EIBAX?

SDMZX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to EIBAX (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDMZX dropped -9.76% vs EIBAX's -17.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDMZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.