PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDMGX vs. FQEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDMGX vs. FQEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDMGX achieves a 22.60% return, which is significantly lower than FQEMX's 77.70% return.


SDMGX

1D
0.39%
1M
1.06%
YTD
22.60%
6M
23.67%
1Y
47.02%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
11.17%

FQEMX

1D
1.17%
1M
1.76%
YTD
77.70%
6M
83.04%
1Y
128.99%
3Y*
46.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDMGX vs. FQEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SDMGX
SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund
22.60%36.11%13.58%7.37%-17.23%-6.13%
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
77.70%55.98%6.67%12.18%-20.68%0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SDMGX and FQEMX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021

0.83

The correlation between SDMGX and FQEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDMGX vs. FQEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDMGX
SDMGX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SDMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SDMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FQEMX
FQEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FQEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FQEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDMGX vs. FQEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDMGXFQEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.69

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

7.06

-3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.68

25.56

-11.88

SDMGX vs. FQEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDMGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is lower than the FQEMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDMGX and FQEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDMGX vs. FQEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDMGX drawdown since its inception was -67.12%, which is greater than FQEMX's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMGX and FQEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDMGXFQEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.12%

-34.46%

-32.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-18.93%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-18.93%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.97%

-7.73%

+1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.56%

-10.71%

-12.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

5.17%

-1.65%

Volatility

SDMGX vs. FQEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX) is 13.91%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM (FQEMX) has a volatility of 21.09%. This indicates that SDMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDMGXFQEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.91%

21.09%

-7.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.90%

30.88%

-10.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.47%

33.43%

-10.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.26%

22.65%

-2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.69%

22.65%

-2.96%

SDMGX vs. FQEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDMGX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FQEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDMGX vs. FQEMX - Dividend Comparison

SDMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than FQEMX's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQEMX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series EM
1.79%3.18%3.15%4.82%3.93%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDMGX
SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund
0.71%0.87%4.13%2.03%2.44%2.13%0.26%1.75%1.67%1.45%0.27%3.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDMGX and FQEMX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQEMX has higher volatility (21.09%) compared to SDMGX (13.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDMGX dropped -67.12% vs FQEMX's -34.46%.

FQEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.01 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDMGX and FQEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer