SDMGX vs. NBNGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SDMGX (SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund) and NBNGX (SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - SDMGX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Sit, while NBNGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Sit. Over the past 10 years, SDMGX returned 9.68%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for NBNGX. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SDMGX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for NBNGX.

Performance

SDMGX vs. NBNGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX) and SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDMGX achieves a 15.69% return, which is significantly higher than NBNGX's 10.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SDMGX has underperformed NBNGX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while NBNGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.

SDMGX

• 1D: 4.38%
• 1M: -2.07%
• 6M: 8.94%
• YTD: 15.69%
• 1Y: 37.11%
• 3Y*: 19.67%
• 5Y*: 8.33%
• 10Y*: 9.68%
• ALL TIME*: 5.43%

NBNGX

• 1D: 2.89%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 8.66%
• YTD: 10.14%
• 1Y: 17.19%
• 3Y*: 30.11%
• 5Y*: 14.80%
• 10Y*: 15.77%
• ALL TIME*: 9.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SDMGX SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SDMGX vs. NBNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SDMGX SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund	15.69%	36.11%	13.58%	7.37%	-17.23%	-8.88%	23.14%	19.77%	-14.76%	43.22%
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund	10.14%	8.72%	74.13%	21.98%	-24.10%	15.78%	33.16%	30.27%	-7.42%	19.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SDMGX and NBNGX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 1995	0.64

The correlation between SDMGX and NBNGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SDMGX vs. NBNGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDMGX

SDMGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
SDMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SDMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SDMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SDMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SDMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

NBNGX

NBNGX Risk / Return Rank: 23
NBNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
NBNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
NBNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
NBNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
NBNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDMGX vs. NBNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX) and SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SDMGX	NBNGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	0.72	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	1.09	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.13	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	1.41	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.27	4.43	+2.84

SDMGX vs. NBNGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the NBNGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDMGX and NBNGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SDMGX vs. NBNGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDMGX drawdown since its inception was -67.12%, smaller than the maximum NBNGX drawdown of -70.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMGX and NBNGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDMGX	NBNGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.12%	-70.94%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.00%	-9.70%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.90%	-24.71%	+5.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.31%	-34.84%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.63%	-35.14%	-9.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.27%	-3.50%	-7.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.52%	-21.05%	-2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.60%	3.09%	+1.51%

Volatility

SDMGX vs. NBNGX - Volatility Comparison

SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX) has a higher volatility of 8.98% compared to SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) at 5.85%. This indicates that SDMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBNGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDMGX	NBNGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.98%	5.85%	+3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.67%	15.45%	+6.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.18%	19.04%	+5.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.51%	30.23%	-9.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.85%	25.91%	-6.06%

SDMGX vs. NBNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDMGX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NBNGX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDMGX vs. NBNGX - Dividend Comparison

SDMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than NBNGX's 3.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund	3.08%	3.39%	38.38%	0.47%	3.08%	12.28%	4.17%	7.51%	12.40%	4.24%	1.00%	18.44%
SDMGX SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund	0.75%	0.87%	4.13%	2.03%	2.44%	2.13%	0.26%	1.75%	1.67%	1.45%	0.27%	3.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDMGX and NBNGX in my portfolio?

SDMGX and NBNGX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDMGX or NBNGX?

SDMGX has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to NBNGX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDMGX dropped -67.12% vs NBNGX's -70.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.