SDMGX vs. FCEEX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SDMGX (SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund) and FCEEX (Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, SDMGX returned 9.54%/yr vs 10.38%/yr for FCEEX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDMGX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for FCEEX.

Performance

SDMGX vs. FCEEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SDMGX having a 30.38% return and FCEEX slightly higher at 30.78%.

SDMGX

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: 13.85%
• YTD: 30.38%
• 6M: 34.33%
• 1Y: 62.92%
• 3Y*: 26.84%
• 5Y*: 9.54%
• 10Y*: 11.60%

FCEEX

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 9.92%
• YTD: 30.78%
• 6M: 32.80%
• 1Y: 59.40%
• 3Y*: 28.19%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDMGX vs. FCEEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SDMGX SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund	30.38%	36.11%	13.58%	7.37%	-17.23%	-8.88%	23.14%	10.63%
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	30.78%	34.81%	10.51%	12.52%	-16.96%	-1.29%	10.19%	9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SDMGX and FCEEX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.89

The correlation between SDMGX and FCEEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SDMGX vs. FCEEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDMGX

SDMGX Risk / Return Rank: 91
SDMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SDMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SDMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SDMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SDMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FCEEX

FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDMGX vs. FCEEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDMGX	FCEEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.42	3.37	+0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	4.26	+0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.62	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.91	4.63	+0.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.88	18.43	+1.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDMGX vs. FCEEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDMGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is comparable to the FCEEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDMGX and FCEEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDMGX	FCEEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.42	3.37	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.62	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.67	-0.39

Drawdowns

SDMGX vs. FCEEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDMGX drawdown since its inception was -67.12%, which is greater than FCEEX's maximum drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMGX and FCEEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDMGX	FCEEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.12%	-34.68%	-32.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.00%	-12.98%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.90%	-15.47%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.80%	-33.90%	-5.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.60%	-11.26%	-12.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	3.25%	-0.04%

Volatility

SDMGX vs. FCEEX - Volatility Comparison

SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) have volatilities of 7.66% and 7.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDMGX	FCEEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.66%	7.77%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.41%	15.07%	+0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.68%	17.85%	+0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.47%	16.96%	+2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.37%	18.37%	+1.00%

SDMGX vs. FCEEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDMGX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FCEEX's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDMGX vs. FCEEX - Dividend Comparison

SDMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than FCEEX's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	2.25%	3.29%	4.17%	4.36%	4.08%	3.38%	2.98%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SDMGX SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund	0.67%	0.87%	4.13%	2.03%	2.44%	2.13%	0.26%	1.75%	1.67%	1.45%	0.27%	3.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDMGX and FCEEX in my portfolio?

SDMGX and FCEEX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDMGX or FCEEX?

FCEEX has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to SDMGX (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDMGX dropped -67.12% vs FCEEX's -34.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 3.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.