PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDIA.L vs. SLXX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDIA.L vs. SLXX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) and iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SDIA.L is traded in USD, while SLXX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SLXX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDIA.L achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than SLXX.L's -0.33% return.


SDIA.L

1D
0.11%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.24%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*

SLXX.L

1D
0.26%
1M
1.20%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
0.88%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
-1.81%
10Y*
1.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDIA.L vs. SLXX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDIA.L
iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.79%6.17%4.99%5.64%-4.49%-0.70%4.50%6.12%0.82%0.92%
SLXX.L
iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF
-0.33%14.54%-0.10%14.27%-27.09%-4.88%12.37%15.77%-8.27%6.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SDIA.L and SLXX.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2017

0.41

The correlation between SDIA.L and SLXX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDIA.L vs. SLXX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDIA.L
SDIA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SDIA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDIA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDIA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SDIA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDIA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SLXX.L
SLXX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SLXX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLXX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLXX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SLXX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLXX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDIA.L vs. SLXX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) and iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDIA.LSLXX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.07

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

0.53

+3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.33

1.38

+14.96

SDIA.L vs. SLXX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDIA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the SLXX.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDIA.L and SLXX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDIA.LSLXX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

0.39

+1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

-0.14

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.11

+0.68

Drawdowns

SDIA.L vs. SLXX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDIA.L drawdown since its inception was -12.55%, smaller than the maximum SLXX.L drawdown of -46.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIA.L and SLXX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDIA.LSLXX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.55%

-46.39%

+33.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.02%

-7.02%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.32%

-10.95%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.61%

-45.36%

+37.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-10.21%

+10.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.17%

-11.95%

+10.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

2.72%

-2.46%

Volatility

SDIA.L vs. SLXX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) is 0.83%, while iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that SDIA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLXX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDIA.LSLXX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

3.08%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

7.49%

-5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

9.70%

-7.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.62%

12.84%

-10.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.44%

12.82%

-9.38%

SDIA.L vs. SLXX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SDIA.L and SLXX.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SDIA.L vs. SLXX.L - Dividend Comparison

SDIA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLXX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDIA.L
iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLXX.L
iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF
4.93%4.82%4.68%4.06%2.75%2.06%2.12%2.44%2.71%2.73%2.99%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDIA.L and SLXX.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SDIA.L and SLXX.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

SDIA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while SLXX.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDIA.L and SLXX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer