SDIA.L vs. CRPA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) and iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CRPA.L).
SDIA.L and CRPA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SDIA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. It was launched on Apr 13, 2017. CRPA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. It was launched on May 10, 2018. Both SDIA.L and CRPA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SDIA.L vs. CRPA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SDIA.L vs. CRPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDIA.L iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.08% | 6.17% | 4.99% | 5.64% | -4.49% | -0.70% | 4.50% | 6.12% | 1.60% |
CRPA.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.89% | 9.97% | 1.12% | 9.38% | -16.34% | -3.65% | 10.07% | 11.53% | -0.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDIA.L achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than CRPA.L's -0.89% return.
SDIA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- —
CRPA.L
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- 6.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.27%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SDIA.L vs. CRPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SDIA.L and CRPA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SDIA.L vs. CRPA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SDIA.L
CRPA.L
SDIA.L vs. CRPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) and iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CRPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDIA.L | CRPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 1.16 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 1.63 | +0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.21 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 1.67 | +1.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.64 | 6.19 | +9.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDIA.L | CRPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.16 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.04 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.32 | +0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between SDIA.L and CRPA.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SDIA.L vs. CRPA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SDIA.L nor CRPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SDIA.L vs. CRPA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDIA.L drawdown since its inception was -12.55%, smaller than the maximum CRPA.L drawdown of -25.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDIA.L and CRPA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDIA.L | CRPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -25.34% | +12.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.32% | -3.64% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.61% | -24.86% | +17.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -2.83% | +2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -7.14% | +5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 0.98% | -0.70% |
Volatility
SDIA.L vs. CRPA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) is 0.76%, while iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CRPA.L) has a volatility of 2.15%. This indicates that SDIA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SDIA.L | CRPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 2.15% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.17% | 3.39% | -2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38% | 5.31% | -2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.58% | 6.71% | -4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.45% | 6.79% | -3.34% |