SDHG.L vs. ISAC.L
SDHG.L (iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SDHG.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while ISAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDHG.L returned 7.60%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for ISAC.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDHG.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.
Performance
SDHG.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SDHG.L is traded in GBP, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDHG.L achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SDHG.L has underperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of 7.60%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.
SDHG.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 3.15%
- 1Y
- 11.14%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
ISAC.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- 1Y
- 30.05%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
SDHG.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDHG.L iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 2.17% | 3.69% | 10.34% | 4.51% | 9.19% | 6.61% | 1.92% | 7.77% | 7.80% | -3.56% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.99% | 13.64% | 19.87% | 16.44% | -8.43% | 19.97% | 12.26% | 20.98% | -4.37% | 13.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDHG.L and ISAC.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SDHG.L and ISAC.L has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDHG.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
SDHG.L
ISAC.L
SDHG.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDHG.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.47 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 4.35 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 16.70 | -5.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDHG.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.52 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.88 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.87 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
SDHG.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDHG.L drawdown since its inception was -11.44%, smaller than the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHG.L and ISAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDHG.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.44% | -25.84% | +14.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.00% | -6.88% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.95% | -18.33% | +9.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.53% | -18.33% | +7.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.44% | -25.84% | +14.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.36% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -3.56% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.80% | -0.85% |
Volatility
SDHG.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) is 1.48%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that SDHG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDHG.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 3.70% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.11% | 9.23% | -5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.88% | 11.88% | -6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.58% | 14.28% | -6.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.19% | 15.48% | -6.29% |
SDHG.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDHG.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDHG.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
SDHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.18%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDHG.L iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 11.18% | 8.87% | 8.03% | 7.20% | 5.20% | 5.72% | 6.58% | 6.95% | 7.01% | 7.33% | 6.99% | 7.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDHG.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SDHG.L.
SDHG.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. SDHG.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SDHG.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.
Find the right allocation for SDHG.L and ISAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer