SDHA.L vs. IAU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SDHA.L (iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SDHA.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDHA.L returned 4.65%/yr vs 18.52%/yr for IAU. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDHA.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.

Performance

SDHA.L vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDHA.L achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 3.83% return.

SDHA.L

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 7.09%
• 3Y*: 7.71%
• 5Y*: 4.65%
• 10Y*: —

IAU

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 3.83%
• 6M: 6.31%
• 1Y: 32.47%
• 3Y*: 31.39%
• 5Y*: 18.52%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDHA.L vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SDHA.L iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	1.56%	8.87%	6.63%	8.90%	-3.48%	3.62%	3.98%	9.51%	-0.74%
IAU iShares Gold Trust	3.83%	63.95%	26.85%	12.84%	-0.63%	-4.00%	25.03%	17.98%	2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SDHA.L and IAU is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018	0.10

SDHA.L vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SDHA.L	IAU
Utilities	77.9%	-
Real Estate	22.1%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

SDHA.L vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDHA.L

SDHA.L Risk / Return Rank: 74
SDHA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SDHA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SDHA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SDHA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SDHA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

IAU

IAU Risk / Return Rank: 34
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDHA.L vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDHA.L	IAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	1.24	+0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	1.63	+1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.25	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	1.70	+2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.08	4.18	+12.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDHA.L vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDHA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDHA.L and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDHA.L	IAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	1.24	+0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	1.04	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.63	+0.13

Drawdowns

SDHA.L vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDHA.L drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHA.L and IAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDHA.L	IAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.77%	-45.14%	+27.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.85%	-19.18%	+17.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.57%	-19.18%	+14.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.30%	-20.93%	+12.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-17.02%	+16.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.25%	-15.96%	+14.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.41%	7.79%	-7.38%

Volatility

SDHA.L vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) is 1.32%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that SDHA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDHA.L	IAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	5.50%	-4.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.69%	23.03%	-20.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.33%	26.41%	-23.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.49%	17.94%	-12.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.39%	15.90%	-9.51%

SDHA.L vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDHA.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDHA.L vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither SDHA.L nor IAU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDHA.L and IAU in my portfolio?

SDHA.L and IAU have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SDHA.L or IAU?

On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDHA.L or IAU?

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SDHA.L.

What is the main difference between SDHA.L and IAU?

SDHA.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IAU is Gold. SDHA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SDHA.L and 0.25% for IAU.