SDHA.L vs. SDHG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L).
SDHA.L and SDHG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SDHA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. It was launched on Jun 29, 2018. SDHG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. It was launched on Oct 15, 2013. Both SDHA.L and SDHG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SDHA.L or SDHG.L.
Key characteristics
| SDHA.L | SDHG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.53% | 7.70% |
| 1Y Return | 9.34% | 9.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.98% | 7.26% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.08% | 5.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.55 | 1.64 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.23 | 2.73 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.55 | 1.31 |
| Calmar Ratio | 6.20 | 1.61 |
| Martin Ratio | 24.86 | 8.69 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.39% | 1.05% |
| Daily Std Dev | 3.87% | 5.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.77% | -11.44% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.37% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDHA.L and SDHG.L is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SDHA.L vs. SDHG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SDHA.L achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than SDHG.L's 7.70% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SDHA.L vs. SDHG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SDHA.L and SDHG.L have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SDHA.L vs. SDHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) and iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SDHA.L vs. SDHG.L - Dividend Comparison
SDHA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SDHG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDHA.L iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDHG.L iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 7.54% | 7.20% | 5.20% | 5.72% | 6.58% | 6.95% | 7.01% | 7.33% | 6.99% | 7.49% | 6.88% | 0.83% |
Drawdowns
SDHA.L vs. SDHG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDHA.L drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, which is greater than SDHG.L's maximum drawdown of -11.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDHA.L and SDHG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SDHA.L vs. SDHG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SDHA.L) is 0.81%, while iShares USD Short Duration High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SDHG.L) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that SDHA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDHG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.