SDG vs. UFO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF (SDG) and Procure Space ETF (UFO).
SDG and UFO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SDG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Sustainable Development Index. It was launched on Apr 20, 2016. UFO is a passively managed fund by ProcureAM that tracks the performance of the S-Network Space Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2019. Both SDG and UFO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SDG vs. UFO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SDG vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDG iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF | -0.32% | 20.19% | -10.09% | 4.59% | -11.51% | -1.20% | 44.36% | 11.21% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 15.94% | 67.36% | 27.22% | -2.34% | -25.85% | 7.17% | -2.15% | 5.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDG achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 15.94% return.
SDG
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 18.43%
- 3Y*
- 3.93%
- 5Y*
- -0.71%
- 10Y*
- —
UFO
- 1D
- 5.44%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 15.94%
- 6M
- 25.90%
- 1Y
- 104.04%
- 3Y*
- 34.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.04%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SDG vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SDG vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank
SDG
UFO
SDG vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF (SDG) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDG | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 2.84 | -1.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 3.39 | -1.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.41 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 4.67 | -2.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.92 | 15.32 | -8.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDG | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.84 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.39 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.34 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between SDG and UFO is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SDG vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison
SDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than UFO's 0.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDG iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF | 2.00% | 2.00% | 1.95% | 1.77% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 0.97% | 1.39% | 2.47% | 2.54% | 1.34% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.37% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SDG vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDG drawdown since its inception was -30.35%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDG and UFO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDG | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.35% | -50.33% | +19.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.98% | -21.95% | +11.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.35% | -50.33% | +19.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.06% | -6.94% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.77% | -22.30% | +12.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 6.69% | -4.13% |
Volatility
SDG vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF (SDG) is 7.01%, while Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a volatility of 12.88%. This indicates that SDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SDG | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 12.88% | -5.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.78% | 28.59% | -17.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 36.91% | -20.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 28.81% | -13.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 30.19% | -13.53% |