PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDEM vs. GLDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDEM vs. GLDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than GLDI's -2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, SDEM has underperformed GLDI with an annualized return of 5.26%, while GLDI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.20% annualized return.


SDEM

1D
0.93%
1M
0.85%
YTD
11.17%
6M
12.41%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
5.26%

GLDI

1D
0.42%
1M
-6.93%
YTD
-2.64%
6M
-2.08%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
8.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDEM vs. GLDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
11.17%32.01%4.02%12.64%-21.53%2.11%-11.13%17.56%-17.40%16.57%
GLDI
Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN
-2.64%34.25%17.76%8.93%-1.11%-3.42%23.50%14.40%-0.54%8.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SDEM and GLDI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015

0.20

The correlation between SDEM and GLDI shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDEM vs. GLDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDEM
SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDI
GLDI Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GLDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDI Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDEM vs. GLDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDEMGLDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.20

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

1.05

+2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

3.77

+6.51

SDEM vs. GLDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the GLDI Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDEM and GLDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDEM vs. GLDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than GLDI's maximum drawdown of -32.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and GLDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDEMGLDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.38%

-32.26%

-15.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-14.14%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-14.14%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.25%

-14.14%

-22.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.38%

-14.94%

-32.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.49%

-11.63%

+8.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

-13.99%

-6.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

3.94%

-1.20%

Volatility

SDEM vs. GLDI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) is 4.90%, while Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that SDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDEMGLDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

6.70%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

14.24%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

15.75%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

11.61%

+5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

11.50%

+7.72%

SDEM vs. GLDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDEM vs. GLDI - Dividend Comparison

SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than GLDI's 23.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDI
Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN
23.45%16.15%10.45%10.02%13.73%10.65%14.25%7.25%5.33%7.77%17.26%10.07%
SDEM
Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF
4.99%5.27%7.28%7.50%8.86%8.14%6.30%6.47%6.55%5.01%5.06%6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDEM and GLDI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDI has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to SDEM (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs GLDI's -32.26%.

On 10-year performance, GLDI leads with 8.20% vs 5.26% for SDEM. On fees, GLDI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SDEM has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLDI has performed better with a 8.20% return vs 5.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for SDEM.

GLDI has the higher dividend yield at 23.45%, compared with 4.99% for SDEM.

SDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GLDI is Precious Metals. SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while GLDI tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.65% for GLDI.

SDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDEM and GLDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer