SDD vs. TSLZ
SDD (ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SDD is passively managed, while TSLZ is actively managed. Over the past year, SDD returned -41.53% vs -69.92% for TSLZ. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.
Performance
SDD vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDD achieves a -23.94% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's 9.40% return.
SDD
- 1D
- 3.63%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- -23.94%
- 6M
- -22.77%
- 1Y
- -41.53%
- 3Y*
- -23.30%
- 5Y*
- -14.95%
- 10Y*
- -26.75%
TSLZ
- 1D
- 13.07%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 9.40%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- -69.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDD vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SDD ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 | -23.94% | -14.69% | -13.60% | -30.88% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 9.40% | -75.98% | -88.79% | -28.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDD and TSLZ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDD vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
SDD
TSLZ
SDD vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDD | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.86 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.94 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | -1.20 | -0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDD | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | -0.80 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | -0.66 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
SDD vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDD drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDD and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDD | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.93% | -99.11% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.74% | -74.76% | +31.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | -98.85% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.92% | -75.43% | -11.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.68% | 60.93% | -34.25% |
Volatility
SDD vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) is 9.35%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a volatility of 27.21%. This indicates that SDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDD | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 27.21% | -17.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.32% | 55.73% | -31.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.17% | 92.36% | -56.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.23% | 117.17% | -73.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.16% | 117.17% | -72.01% |
SDD vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDD vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
SDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than TSLZ's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDD ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 | 6.11% | 5.07% | 4.34% | 3.84% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 0.52% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.63% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDD and TSLZ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLZ has higher volatility (27.21%) compared to SDD (9.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDD dropped -99.93% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.
On 1-year performance, SDD leads with -41.53% vs -69.92% for TSLZ. On fees, SDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SDD has been the lower-risk option at 9.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SDD has performed better with a -41.53% return vs -69.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.
SDD has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 0.63% for TSLZ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDD and 1.05% for TSLZ.
TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.80 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDD and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer