PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDD vs. TSLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDD vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDD achieves a -32.06% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -8.55% return.


SDD

1D
0.02%
1M
-2.88%
6M
-25.07%
YTD
-32.06%
1Y
-40.76%
3Y*
-24.65%
5Y*
-17.22%
10Y*
-26.98%

TSLZ

1D
-0.55%
1M
-7.82%
6M
-9.36%
YTD
-8.55%
1Y
-66.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDD vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SDD
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
-32.06%-14.69%-13.60%-28.70%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
-8.55%-75.98%-88.79%-24.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SDD and TSLZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDD vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDD
SDD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDD vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDDTSLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.88

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.97

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.45

-1.23

-0.22

SDD vs. TSLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDD Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the TSLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDD and TSLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDD vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDD drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDD and TSLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDDTSLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-99.11%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.71%

-69.73%

+22.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.94%

-99.04%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.96%

-76.11%

-10.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.29%

54.96%

-27.67%

Volatility

SDD vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) is 8.95%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a volatility of 35.63%. This indicates that SDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDDTSLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.95%

35.63%

-26.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.79%

62.61%

-37.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.96%

88.44%

-52.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.10%

117.17%

-74.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.02%

117.17%

-72.15%

SDD vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDD vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

SDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than TSLZ's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SDD
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
6.33%5.07%4.34%3.84%0.33%0.00%0.00%1.20%0.52%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.75%0.69%2.08%12.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDD and TSLZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLZ has higher volatility (35.63%) compared to SDD (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDD dropped -99.94% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.

On 1-year performance, SDD leads with -40.76% vs -66.66% for TSLZ. On fees, SDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SDD has been the lower-risk option at 8.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SDD has performed better with a -40.76% return vs -66.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.

SDD has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 0.75% for TSLZ.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDD and 1.05% for TSLZ.

TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDD and TSLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer