PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDD vs. ESIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDD vs. ESIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDD achieves a -23.94% return, which is significantly lower than ESIX's 10.83% return.


SDD

1D
3.63%
1M
2.05%
YTD
-23.94%
6M
-22.77%
1Y
-41.53%
3Y*
-23.30%
5Y*
-14.95%
10Y*
-26.75%

ESIX

1D
-1.16%
1M
-2.42%
YTD
10.83%
6M
10.40%
1Y
22.64%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDD vs. ESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SDD
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
-23.94%-14.69%-13.60%-25.99%18.55%
ESIX
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF
10.83%1.83%9.66%17.51%-14.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SDD and ESIX is -0.94, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2022

-0.98

The correlation between SDD and ESIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDD vs. ESIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDD
SDD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIX
ESIX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDD vs. ESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) and SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDDESIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.21

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

2.08

-3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.56

6.57

-8.13

SDD vs. ESIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDD Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the ESIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDD and ESIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDDESIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.15

1.20

-2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.59

0.24

-0.82

Drawdowns

SDD vs. ESIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDD drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than ESIX's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDD and ESIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDDESIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.93%

-27.56%

-72.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.74%

-10.18%

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.26%

-27.56%

-37.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.93%

-2.42%

-97.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.92%

-8.59%

-78.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.68%

3.22%

+23.46%

Volatility

SDD vs. ESIX - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600 (SDD) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) at 4.19%. This indicates that SDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDDESIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.35%

4.19%

+5.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.32%

12.40%

+11.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.17%

17.99%

+18.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.23%

21.53%

+21.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.16%

21.53%

+23.63%

SDD vs. ESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIX's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDD vs. ESIX - Dividend Comparison

SDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than ESIX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ESIX
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF
1.45%1.64%1.65%1.69%1.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDD
ProShares UltraShort SmallCap600
6.11%5.07%4.34%3.84%0.33%0.00%0.00%1.20%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDD and ESIX have a correlation of -0.94, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDD has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to ESIX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDD dropped -99.93% vs ESIX's -27.56%.

On 3-year performance, ESIX leads with 14.39% vs -23.30% for SDD. On fees, ESIX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ESIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ESIX has performed better with a 14.39% return vs -23.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESIX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SDD.

SDD has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 1.45% for ESIX.

SDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ESIX is Small Cap Blend Equities. SDD tracks S&P Small Cap 600 (-200%), while ESIX tracks S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SDD and 0.12% for ESIX.

ESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDD and ESIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer