SDCI vs. TSM
SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by Wainwright, Inc., while TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SDCI returned 19.07%/yr vs 31.30%/yr for TSM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SDCI vs. TSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDCI achieves a 23.24% return, which is significantly lower than TSM's 40.22% return.
SDCI
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- 23.24%
- 6M
- 21.10%
- 1Y
- 27.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.61%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- —
TSM
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 40.22%
- 6M
- 45.91%
- 1Y
- 103.01%
- 3Y*
- 60.80%
- 5Y*
- 31.30%
- 10Y*
- 35.80%
SDCI vs. TSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 23.24% | 17.60% | 17.91% | -0.88% | 33.23% | 36.52% | -10.61% | -2.36% | -13.91% |
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 40.22% | 55.91% | 92.58% | 42.33% | -36.75% | 12.09% | 92.67% | 64.85% | 1.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDCI and TSM is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2018 | 0.15 |
The correlation between SDCI and TSM shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDCI vs. TSM — Risk / Return Rank
SDCI
TSM
SDCI vs. TSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDCI | TSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 5.48 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 19.42 | -8.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDCI vs. TSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDCI drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, smaller than the maximum TSM drawdown of -89.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDCI and TSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDCI | TSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -89.08% | +43.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -18.14% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.96% | -36.82% | +24.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.55% | -56.47% | +37.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -4.87% | -2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.56% | -42.85% | +31.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 5.11% | -2.41% |
Volatility
SDCI vs. TSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) is 3.46%, while Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) has a volatility of 13.42%. This indicates that SDCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDCI | TSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 13.42% | -9.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.34% | 28.65% | -14.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.93% | 36.69% | -19.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 37.46% | -18.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 34.23% | -17.16% |
Dividends
SDCI vs. TSM - Dividend Comparison
SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than TSM's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 2.99% | 3.68% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 33.49% | 19.26% | 0.20% | 0.93% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited | 0.83% | 1.00% | 1.18% | 1.78% | 2.49% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 3.46% | 3.64% | 2.32% | 2.61% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDCI and TSM have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSM has higher volatility (13.42%) compared to SDCI (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDCI dropped -45.79% vs TSM's -89.08%.
TSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDCI and TSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer