SDCI vs. FTGC
SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. SDCI is passively managed, while FTGC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDCI returned 20.42%/yr vs 12.66%/yr for FTGC. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDCI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FTGC.
Performance
SDCI vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDCI achieves a 27.96% return, which is significantly higher than FTGC's 25.30% return.
SDCI
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 22.03%
- YTD
- 27.96%
- 1Y
- 33.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.67%
- 5Y*
- 20.42%
- 10Y*
- —
FTGC
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 20.93%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 1Y
- 34.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
SDCI vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 27.96% | 17.60% | 17.91% | -0.88% | 33.23% | 36.52% | -10.61% | -2.36% | -13.91% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 25.30% | 14.61% | 9.96% | -5.36% | 17.36% | 27.95% | 2.17% | 6.40% | -15.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDCI and FTGC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SDCI and FTGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDCI vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank
SDCI
FTGC
SDCI vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDCI | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.81 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 9.29 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDCI vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDCI drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDCI and FTGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDCI | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -59.47% | +13.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.03% | -12.34% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.96% | -12.34% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.55% | -22.64% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -6.04% | +2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -27.25% | +15.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 3.72% | -0.20% |
Volatility
SDCI vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) at 4.50%. This indicates that SDCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDCI | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 4.50% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.59% | 13.39% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 15.79% | +1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 15.87% | +2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 14.72% | +2.36% |
SDCI vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDCI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDCI vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison
SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than FTGC's 15.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 15.46% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 2.88% | 3.68% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 33.49% | 19.26% | 0.20% | 0.93% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SDCI and FTGC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SDCI has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to FTGC (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDCI dropped -45.79% vs FTGC's -59.47%.
On 5-year performance, SDCI leads with 20.42% vs 12.66% for FTGC. On fees, SDCI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTGC has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 20.42% return vs 12.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDCI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.46%, compared with 2.88% for SDCI.
They also come from different issuers: USCF Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SDCI and 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDCI and FTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer