PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDCI vs. EIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SDCI vs. EIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SDCI vs. EIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
22.70%17.60%17.91%-0.88%33.23%36.52%-10.61%0.93%
EIC
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
-13.41%-15.28%24.02%20.86%-10.48%28.01%-14.41%-0.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDCI achieves a 22.70% return, which is significantly higher than EIC's -13.41% return.


SDCI

1D
-0.77%
1M
9.08%
YTD
22.70%
6M
21.72%
1Y
29.96%
3Y*
21.13%
5Y*
22.45%
10Y*

EIC

1D
1.38%
1M
-3.01%
YTD
-13.41%
6M
-23.58%
1Y
-27.52%
3Y*
1.48%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDCI vs. EIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

EIC
EIC Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
EIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDCI vs. EIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDCIEICDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

-1.08

+2.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

-1.39

+3.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.80

+0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

-0.87

+3.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.09

-1.78

+10.87

SDCI vs. EIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the EIC Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDCI and EIC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDCIEICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

-1.08

+2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

0.16

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.03

+0.63

Correlation

The correlation between SDCI and EIC is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SDCI vs. EIC - Dividend Comparison

SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than EIC's 17.87% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
3.00%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%
EIC
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
17.87%17.35%15.44%13.59%11.03%7.78%10.39%3.65%0.00%

Drawdowns

SDCI vs. EIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDCI drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, smaller than the maximum EIC drawdown of -67.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDCI and EIC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SDCIEICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.79%

-67.08%

+21.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-30.43%

+18.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

-34.06%

+15.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-31.48%

+30.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.80%

-11.91%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

14.95%

-11.43%

Volatility

SDCI vs. EIC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) is 7.05%, while Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that SDCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SDCIEICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

7.65%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

14.53%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.34%

25.65%

-7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.45%

20.16%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

37.88%

-20.77%