PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDCI vs. BNDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDCI vs. BNDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDCI achieves a 26.96% return, which is significantly higher than BNDI's 1.46% return.


SDCI

1D
-1.51%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
26.96%
6M
23.85%
1Y
38.59%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
19.79%
10Y*

BNDI

1D
0.17%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.61%
1Y
6.66%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDCI vs. BNDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
26.96%17.60%17.91%-0.88%1.99%
BNDI
Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
1.46%7.95%1.74%6.89%-2.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SDCI and BNDI is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022

-0.05

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SDCI and BNDI has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

SDCI vs. BNDI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDCI
BNDI

Financial Services

15.4%
11.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

SDCI
15.4%
BNDI
11.8%

Basic Materials

SDCI

-

BNDI
1.8%

Communication Services

SDCI

-

BNDI
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SDCI

-

BNDI
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

SDCI

-

BNDI
4.9%

Energy

SDCI

-

BNDI
3.5%

Healthcare

SDCI

-

BNDI
8.5%

Industrials

SDCI

-

BNDI
8.3%

Real Estate

SDCI

-

BNDI
1.9%

Technology

SDCI

-

BNDI
35.6%

Utilities

SDCI

-

BNDI
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDCI vs. BNDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDI
BNDI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BNDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDI Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDCI vs. BNDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDCIBNDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.29

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

2.43

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.33

8.67

+6.67

SDCI vs. BNDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the BNDI Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDCI and BNDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDCIBNDIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.61

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.66

+0.01

Drawdowns

SDCI vs. BNDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDCI drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, which is greater than BNDI's maximum drawdown of -6.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDCI and BNDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDCIBNDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.79%

-6.98%

-38.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-2.75%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

-5.83%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.51%

-0.67%

-3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.58%

-1.71%

-9.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

0.77%

+1.75%

Volatility

SDCI vs. BNDI - Volatility Comparison

USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) at 1.37%. This indicates that SDCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDCIBNDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

1.37%

+3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

3.08%

+11.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.89%

4.17%

+12.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

6.19%

+12.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

6.19%

+10.89%

SDCI vs. BNDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDI's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDCI vs. BNDI - Dividend Comparison

SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than BNDI's 5.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BNDI
Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
5.79%5.69%5.54%5.17%1.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
2.90%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDCI and BNDI have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDCI has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to BNDI (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDCI dropped -45.79% vs BNDI's -6.98%.

On 3-year performance, SDCI leads with 22.95% vs 4.89% for BNDI. On fees, BNDI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BNDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 22.95% return vs 4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SDCI.

BNDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 2.90% for SDCI.

SDCI is categorized as Commodities, while BNDI is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Wainwright, Inc. and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SDCI and 0.58% for BNDI.

SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDCI and BNDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer