SDCI vs. BNDI
SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund) and BNDI (Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Wainwright, Inc., while BNDI is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SDCI returned 22.95%/yr vs 4.89%/yr for BNDI. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. SDCI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for BNDI.
Performance
SDCI vs. BNDI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDCI achieves a 26.96% return, which is significantly higher than BNDI's 1.46% return.
SDCI
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 26.96%
- 6M
- 23.85%
- 1Y
- 38.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.95%
- 5Y*
- 19.79%
- 10Y*
- —
BNDI
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 6.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDCI vs. BNDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 26.96% | 17.60% | 17.91% | -0.88% | 1.99% |
BNDI Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.46% | 7.95% | 1.74% | 6.89% | -2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDCI and BNDI is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022 | -0.05 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SDCI and BNDI has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
SDCI vs. BNDI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDCI
BNDI
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SDCI
BNDI
Basic Materials
SDCI
-
BNDI
Communication Services
SDCI
-
BNDI
Consumer Cyclical
SDCI
-
BNDI
Consumer Defensive
SDCI
-
BNDI
Energy
SDCI
-
BNDI
Healthcare
SDCI
-
BNDI
Industrials
SDCI
-
BNDI
Real Estate
SDCI
-
BNDI
Technology
SDCI
-
BNDI
Utilities
SDCI
-
BNDI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDCI vs. BNDI — Risk / Return Rank
SDCI
BNDI
SDCI vs. BNDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDCI | BNDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.29 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 2.43 | +1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.33 | 8.67 | +6.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDCI | BNDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.61 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.66 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
SDCI vs. BNDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDCI drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, which is greater than BNDI's maximum drawdown of -6.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDCI and BNDI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDCI | BNDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -6.98% | -38.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -2.75% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.96% | -5.83% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.51% | -0.67% | -3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.58% | -1.71% | -9.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 0.77% | +1.75% |
Volatility
SDCI vs. BNDI - Volatility Comparison
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) at 1.37%. This indicates that SDCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDCI | BNDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 1.37% | +3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.25% | 3.08% | +11.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 4.17% | +12.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 6.19% | +12.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 6.19% | +10.89% |
SDCI vs. BNDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDI's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDCI vs. BNDI - Dividend Comparison
SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than BNDI's 5.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDI Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF | 5.79% | 5.69% | 5.54% | 5.17% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 2.90% | 3.68% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 33.49% | 19.26% | 0.20% | 0.93% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDCI and BNDI have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDCI has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to BNDI (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDCI dropped -45.79% vs BNDI's -6.98%.
On 3-year performance, SDCI leads with 22.95% vs 4.89% for BNDI. On fees, BNDI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BNDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 22.95% return vs 4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNDI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SDCI.
BNDI has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 2.90% for SDCI.
SDCI is categorized as Commodities, while BNDI is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Wainwright, Inc. and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SDCI and 0.58% for BNDI.
SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDCI and BNDI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer