PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDCI vs. AVSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDCI vs. AVSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDCI achieves a 27.24% return, which is significantly higher than AVSF's 0.45% return.


SDCI

1D
2.45%
1M
3.24%
6M
22.83%
YTD
27.24%
1Y
31.47%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
20.23%
10Y*

AVSF

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.15%
6M
0.48%
YTD
0.45%
1Y
3.40%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
1.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDCI vs. AVSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
27.24%17.60%17.91%-0.88%33.23%36.52%9.13%
AVSF
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF
0.45%6.57%3.81%5.25%-5.52%-1.17%0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SDCI and AVSF is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020

-0.03

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SDCI and AVSF has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDCI vs. AVSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

AVSF
AVSF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AVSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVSF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AVSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDCI vs. AVSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDCIAVSFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.41

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.00

8.67

+0.33

SDCI vs. AVSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the AVSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDCI and AVSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDCI vs. AVSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDCI drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, which is greater than AVSF's maximum drawdown of -8.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDCI and AVSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDCIAVSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.79%

-8.85%

-36.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-1.42%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

-1.42%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

-8.85%

-9.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

-0.53%

-3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

-2.17%

-9.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

0.39%

+3.12%

Volatility

SDCI vs. AVSF - Volatility Comparison

USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF) at 0.67%. This indicates that SDCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDCIAVSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

0.67%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

1.47%

+13.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.17%

1.92%

+15.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.43%

2.67%

+15.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

2.52%

+14.57%

SDCI vs. AVSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDCI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AVSF's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDCI vs. AVSF - Dividend Comparison

SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than AVSF's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVSF
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF
4.38%4.31%4.34%3.93%1.78%0.48%0.10%0.00%0.00%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
2.89%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDCI and AVSF have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDCI has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to AVSF (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDCI dropped -45.79% vs AVSF's -8.85%.

On 5-year performance, SDCI leads with 20.23% vs 1.84% for AVSF. On fees, AVSF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVSF has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 20.23% return vs 1.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVSF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SDCI.

AVSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 2.89% for SDCI.

SDCI is categorized as Commodities, while AVSF is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: USCF Investments and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SDCI and 0.15% for AVSF.

SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDCI and AVSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer