SDCI vs. AVGB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund) and AVGB (Avantis Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Wainwright, Inc., while AVGB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SDCI returned 38.59% vs 4.50% for AVGB. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. SDCI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for AVGB.

Performance

SDCI vs. AVGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDCI achieves a 26.96% return, which is significantly higher than AVGB's 0.84% return.

SDCI

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: -2.95%
• YTD: 26.96%
• 6M: 23.85%
• 1Y: 38.59%
• 3Y*: 22.95%
• 5Y*: 19.79%
• 10Y*: —

AVGB

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 4.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDCI vs. AVGB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund	26.96%	11.50%
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF	0.84%	4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SDCI and AVGB is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025	-0.30

Return for Risk

SDCI vs. AVGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDCI

SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 72
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 79

AVGB

AVGB Risk / Return Rank: 52
AVGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AVGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AVGB Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AVGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
AVGB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDCI vs. AVGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDCI	AVGB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	1.83	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	2.71	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.34	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.29	2.13	+2.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.33	7.95	+7.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDCI vs. AVGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the AVGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDCI and AVGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDCI	AVGB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	1.83	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	2.06	-1.40

Drawdowns

SDCI vs. AVGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDCI drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, which is greater than AVGB's maximum drawdown of -2.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDCI and AVGB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDCI	AVGB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.79%	-2.12%	-43.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.04%	-2.12%	-6.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.51%	-0.37%	-4.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.58%	-0.33%	-11.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	0.57%	+1.95%

Volatility

SDCI vs. AVGB - Volatility Comparison

USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) at 0.84%. This indicates that SDCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDCI	AVGB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.82%	0.84%	+3.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.25%	1.91%	+12.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.89%	2.48%	+14.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.46%	2.48%	+15.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.08%	2.48%	+14.60%

SDCI vs. AVGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGB's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDCI vs. AVGB - Dividend Comparison

SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than AVGB's 3.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF	3.46%	3.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund	2.90%	3.68%	5.92%	3.46%	33.49%	19.26%	0.20%	0.93%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDCI and AVGB in my portfolio?

SDCI and AVGB have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDCI or AVGB?

SDCI has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to AVGB (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDCI dropped -45.79% vs AVGB's -2.12%.

Which ETF is better, SDCI or AVGB?

On 1-year performance, SDCI leads with 38.59% vs 4.50% for AVGB. On fees, AVGB is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AVGB has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SDCI or AVGB?

Over the 1-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 38.59% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDCI or AVGB?

AVGB is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SDCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDCI or AVGB?

AVGB has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 2.90% for SDCI.

What is the main difference between SDCI and AVGB?

SDCI is categorized as Commodities, while AVGB is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Wainwright, Inc. and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SDCI and 0.19% for AVGB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.