PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDAIX vs. PPFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDAIX vs. PPFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund (SDAIX) and Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDAIX achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly higher than PPFIX's 1.77% return.


SDAIX

1D
0.30%
1M
4.05%
YTD
6.73%
6M
6.73%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*

PPFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.77%
6M
1.87%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
6.03%
5Y*
5.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDAIX vs. PPFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SDAIX
Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund
6.73%14.14%13.81%16.25%-17.87%22.93%11.87%23.13%
PPFIX
Princeton Premium Fund
1.77%7.45%4.29%7.54%1.84%14.93%3.32%8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SDAIX and PPFIX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.29

The correlation between SDAIX and PPFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDAIX vs. PPFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDAIX
SDAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SDAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SDAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

PPFIX
PPFIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PPFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDAIX vs. PPFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund (SDAIX) and Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDAIXPPFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.18

7.73

-5.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

22.09

-19.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

10.61

-9.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

26.03

-23.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.53

129.39

-117.86

SDAIX vs. PPFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the PPFIX Sharpe Ratio of 7.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDAIX and PPFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDAIXPPFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

7.73

-5.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.50

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.80

+0.06

Drawdowns

SDAIX vs. PPFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDAIX drawdown since its inception was -24.26%, which is greater than PPFIX's maximum drawdown of -15.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDAIX and PPFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDAIXPPFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.26%

-15.64%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.37%

-0.25%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.25%

-4.49%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

-4.49%

-18.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-1.35%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

0.05%

+1.75%

Volatility

SDAIX vs. PPFIX - Volatility Comparison

Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund (SDAIX) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX) at 0.17%. This indicates that SDAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDAIXPPFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

0.17%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

0.54%

+7.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.57%

0.84%

+8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.46%

3.77%

+8.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.40%

7.12%

+6.28%

SDAIX vs. PPFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDAIX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PPFIX's 1.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDAIX vs. PPFIX - Dividend Comparison

SDAIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPFIX
Princeton Premium Fund
5.59%5.62%6.24%6.86%1.92%7.16%0.44%0.23%0.93%2.68%
SDAIX
Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%28.80%0.00%0.00%0.62%1.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDAIX and PPFIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDAIX has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to PPFIX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDAIX dropped -24.26% vs PPFIX's -15.64%.

PPFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.73 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDAIX and PPFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer