PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDAIX vs. STTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDAIX vs. STTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund (SDAIX) and North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund (STTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDAIX achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly higher than STTIX's 0.10% return.


SDAIX

1D
0.18%
1M
4.55%
YTD
6.92%
6M
6.58%
1Y
20.23%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*

STTIX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.10%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
1.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDAIX vs. STTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SDAIX
Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund
6.92%14.14%13.81%16.25%-17.87%22.93%11.87%23.13%
STTIX
North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund
0.10%6.66%5.94%-1.89%-10.52%4.57%7.19%3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SDAIX and STTIX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.31

The correlation between SDAIX and STTIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDAIX vs. STTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDAIX
SDAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SDAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SDAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

STTIX
STTIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
STTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
STTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
STTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
STTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDAIX vs. STTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund (SDAIX) and North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund (STTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDAIXSTTIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

1.27

+0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.96

1.95

+1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.23

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.62

+0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.49

4.82

+6.66

SDAIX vs. STTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the STTIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDAIX and STTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDAIXSTTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.27

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.01

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.24

+0.62

Drawdowns

SDAIX vs. STTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDAIX drawdown since its inception was -24.26%, which is greater than STTIX's maximum drawdown of -18.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDAIX and STTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDAIXSTTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.26%

-18.71%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.37%

-2.86%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.25%

-13.10%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

-18.71%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.30%

+6.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-4.74%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

0.96%

+0.84%

Volatility

SDAIX vs. STTIX - Volatility Comparison

Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund (SDAIX) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund (STTIX) at 1.31%. This indicates that SDAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDAIXSTTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

1.31%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

2.55%

+5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.56%

3.65%

+5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.46%

9.83%

+2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.40%

7.81%

+5.59%

SDAIX vs. STTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDAIX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than STTIX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDAIX vs. STTIX - Dividend Comparison

SDAIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDAIX
Swan Defined Risk Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%28.80%0.00%0.00%0.62%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STTIX
North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund
4.69%4.26%17.39%2.10%1.03%0.49%1.02%1.68%1.73%0.96%0.99%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDAIX and STTIX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDAIX has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to STTIX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDAIX dropped -24.26% vs STTIX's -18.71%.

SDAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDAIX and STTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer