PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PPFIX vs. PDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PPFIX vs. PDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PPFIX vs. PDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PPFIX
Princeton Premium Fund
1.35%7.45%4.29%7.54%1.84%18.00%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
-1.94%13.96%24.55%8.06%-23.40%5.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPFIX achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than PDO's -1.94% return.


PPFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.35%
6M
3.55%
1Y
6.81%
3Y*
6.32%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*

PDO

1D
2.09%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PPFIX vs. PDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPFIX
PPFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PPFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PDO
PDO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPFIX vs. PDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PPFIXPDODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.00

0.43

+1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

0.65

+1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.96

1.14

+1.83

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

0.54

+1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.67

2.28

+19.39

PPFIX vs. PDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the PDO Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPFIX and PDO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PPFIXPDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

0.43

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.57

0.24

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.25

+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between PPFIX and PDO is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PPFIX vs. PDO - Dividend Comparison

PPFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, less than PDO's 11.63% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PPFIX
Princeton Premium Fund
5.62%5.62%6.24%6.86%1.92%7.16%0.44%0.23%0.93%2.68%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
11.63%11.09%11.29%12.54%19.09%8.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PPFIX vs. PDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPFIX drawdown since its inception was -15.64%, smaller than the maximum PDO drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPFIX and PDO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PPFIXPDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.64%

-36.83%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-11.50%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.49%

-36.83%

+32.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-5.75%

+5.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-14.74%

+13.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

2.81%

-2.54%

Volatility

PPFIX vs. PDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX) is 0.31%, while Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that PPFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PPFIXPDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

7.49%

-7.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.67%

8.65%

-7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58%

14.99%

-11.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.87%

15.91%

-12.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.18%

15.71%

-8.53%