SCYB vs. SCHX
SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SCYB returned 6.99% vs 27.36% for SCHX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
SCYB vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCYB achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.
SCYB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
SCYB vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 8.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCYB and SCHX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SCYB and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCYB vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCYB
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
SCYB
SCHX
Communication Services
SCYB
SCHX
Industrials
SCYB
SCHX
Healthcare
SCYB
SCHX
Energy
SCYB
SCHX
Financial Services
SCYB
SCHX
Technology
SCYB
SCHX
Real Estate
SCYB
SCHX
Basic Materials
SCYB
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
SCYB
SCHX
Utilities
SCYB
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCYB vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
SCYB
SCHX
SCYB vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCYB | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 3.05 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.87 | 13.85 | -0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCYB | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.29 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 0.85 | +0.83 |
Drawdowns
SCYB vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCYB drawdown since its inception was -4.92%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYB and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCYB | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -34.33% | +29.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -9.02% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.70% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -3.97% | +3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 1.98% | -1.44% |
Volatility
SCYB vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) is 1.07%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that SCYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCYB | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 2.91% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 9.02% | -6.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 11.99% | -8.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 17.12% | -11.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 18.15% | -13.02% |
SCYB vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCYB and SCHX have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCYB vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than SCHX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.94% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCYB and SCHX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to SCYB (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCYB dropped -4.92% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 1-year performance, SCHX leads with 27.36% vs 6.99% for SCYB. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, SCYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 27.36% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCYB and SCHX have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 1.01% for SCHX.
SCYB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCYB and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer