SCVAX vs. GTTTX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SCVAX (Allspring Small Company Value Fund) and GTTTX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SCVAX returned 10.55%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for GTTTX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCVAX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GTTTX.

Performance

SCVAX vs. GTTTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCVAX achieves a 18.43% return, which is significantly lower than GTTTX's 21.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SCVAX has underperformed GTTTX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while GTTTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.

SCVAX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.60%
• YTD: 18.43%
• 6M: 15.54%
• 1Y: 26.05%
• 3Y*: 15.09%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

GTTTX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 21.95%
• 6M: 19.36%
• 1Y: 44.12%
• 3Y*: 32.42%
• 5Y*: 15.58%
• 10Y*: 15.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCVAX vs. GTTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCVAX Allspring Small Company Value Fund	18.43%	1.75%	8.22%	15.19%	-12.13%	36.81%	1.99%	22.20%	-14.18%	11.58%
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class	21.95%	12.83%	45.27%	17.37%	-13.66%	32.94%	0.21%	23.37%	-10.83%	7.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SCVAX and GTTTX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008	0.97

The correlation between SCVAX and GTTTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCVAX vs. GTTTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCVAX

SCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 50
SCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
SCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

GTTTX

GTTTX Risk / Return Rank: 87
GTTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GTTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GTTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
GTTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GTTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCVAX vs. GTTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCVAX	GTTTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.49	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	3.46	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.42	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	5.06	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.31	17.80	-7.50

SCVAX vs. GTTTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the GTTTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCVAX and GTTTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCVAX vs. GTTTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCVAX drawdown since its inception was -70.30%, which is greater than GTTTX's maximum drawdown of -56.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCVAX and GTTTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCVAX	GTTTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.30%	-56.58%	-13.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.21%	-9.16%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.83%	-39.29%	+12.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.83%	-39.29%	+12.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.64%	-47.29%	+0.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.19%	-0.36%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.59%	-9.91%	-0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.66%	2.59%	+0.07%

Volatility

SCVAX vs. GTTTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) is 4.58%, while Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that SCVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTTTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCVAX	GTTTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	5.40%	-0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.83%	12.69%	-0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.18%	18.66%	-1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.65%	35.35%	-14.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.19%	30.81%	-7.62%

SCVAX vs. GTTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCVAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GTTTX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCVAX vs. GTTTX - Dividend Comparison

SCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than GTTTX's 6.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class	6.88%	8.39%	52.07%	1.87%	3.85%	40.18%	0.90%	0.90%	12.37%	11.87%	4.51%	7.00%
SCVAX Allspring Small Company Value Fund	4.96%	5.88%	8.23%	0.77%	4.33%	6.02%	0.39%	0.48%	0.71%	0.30%	0.04%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCVAX and GTTTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, SCVAX and GTTTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCVAX or GTTTX?

GTTTX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to SCVAX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCVAX dropped -70.30% vs GTTTX's -56.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.