SCUS vs. BLOX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCUS (Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF) and BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCUS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while BLOX is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCUS charges 0.14%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BLOX.

Performance

SCUS vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCUS achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than BLOX's 16.52% return.

SCUS

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 4.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLOX

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: 10.59%
• YTD: 16.52%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCUS vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF	1.43%	2.52%
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF	16.52%	9.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SCUS and BLOX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.00

SCUS vs. BLOX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCUS	BLOX
Financial Services	26.9%	60.7%
Technology	6.1%	39.3%
Real Estate	3.7%	-
Healthcare	3.0%	-
Industrials	2.3%	-
Energy	1.9%	-
Communication Services	1.5%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-

Return for Risk

SCUS vs. BLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCUS

SCUS Risk / Return Rank: 99
SCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
SCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
SCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCUS vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCUS	BLOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.28	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	12.57	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.76	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	25.13	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	111.55	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCUS	BLOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.42	0.54	+5.88

Drawdowns

SCUS vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCUS drawdown since its inception was -0.17%, smaller than the maximum BLOX drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCUS and BLOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCUS	BLOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.17%	-47.09%	+46.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-19.45%	+19.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-18.53%	+18.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCUS	BLOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67%	53.44%	-52.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.70%	53.44%	-52.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.70%	53.44%	-52.74%

SCUS vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCUS has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCUS vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison

SCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than BLOX's 36.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF	36.81%	22.69%	0.00%
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF	3.91%	4.17%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCUS and BLOX in my portfolio?

SCUS and BLOX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SCUS or BLOX?

On fees, SCUS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCUS or BLOX?

SCUS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCUS or BLOX?

BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 36.81%, compared with 3.91% for SCUS.

What is the main difference between SCUS and BLOX?

SCUS is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BLOX is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for SCUS and 1.03% for BLOX.