SCUB vs. RMRC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) and RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCUB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RMRC.

Performance

SCUB vs. RMRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SCUB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RMRC

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 1.03%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCUB vs. RMRC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.38%
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SCUB and RMRC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026	0.30

Return for Risk

SCUB vs. RMRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

SCUB vs. RMRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCUB drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum RMRC drawdown of -6.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCUB and RMRC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCUB	RMRC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-6.57%	+6.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	-1.63%	+1.62%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCUB	RMRC	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84%	10.22%	-9.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.84%	10.22%	-9.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.84%	10.22%	-9.38%

SCUB vs. RMRC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RMRC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCUB vs. RMRC - Dividend Comparison

SCUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than RMRC's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	0.58%
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCUB and RMRC in my portfolio?

SCUB and RMRC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SCUB or RMRC?

On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCUB or RMRC?

SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RMRC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCUB or RMRC?

SCUB has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.58% for RMRC.

What is the main difference between SCUB and RMRC?

They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SCUB and 0.60% for RMRC.