SCSB vs. RCLR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SCSB (Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF) and RCLR (Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCSB charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RCLR.

Performance

SCSB vs. RCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB) and Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF (RCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SCSB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RCLR

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCSB vs. RCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF	1.22%
RCLR Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF	3.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SCSB and RCLR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026	0.20

Return for Risk

SCSB vs. RCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB) and Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF (RCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

SCSB vs. RCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSB drawdown since its inception was -0.46%, smaller than the maximum RCLR drawdown of -3.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSB and RCLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCSB	RCLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.46%	-3.77%	+3.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.06%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.09%	-0.79%	+0.70%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCSB	RCLR	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47%	3.80%	-2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.47%	3.80%	-2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.47%	3.80%	-2.33%

SCSB vs. RCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSB has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than RCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCSB vs. RCLR - Dividend Comparison

SCSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, while RCLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
RCLR Reckoner BBB-B CLO Reinvesting ETF	0.00%
SCSB Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCSB and RCLR in my portfolio?

SCSB and RCLR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SCSB or RCLR?

On fees, SCSB is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCSB or RCLR?

SCSB is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RCLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCSB or RCLR?

SCSB has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for RCLR.

What is the main difference between SCSB and RCLR?

They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Reckoner. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SCSB and 0.60% for RCLR.