PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCSAX vs. RSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCSAX vs. RSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCSAX achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly higher than RSINX's 6.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCSAX having a 10.73% annualized return and RSINX not far behind at 10.40%.


SCSAX

1D
1.12%
1M
5.87%
YTD
13.01%
6M
12.17%
1Y
19.86%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
10.73%

RSINX

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.11%
YTD
6.06%
6M
7.03%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCSAX vs. RSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCSAX
Allspring Common Stock Fund
13.01%1.44%6.51%15.90%-17.71%21.14%15.34%47.23%-10.02%17.54%
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
6.06%6.39%20.81%13.18%-2.02%25.73%-1.68%28.02%-9.55%16.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SCSAX and RSINX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.87

The correlation between SCSAX and RSINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCSAX vs. RSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCSAX
SCSAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SCSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SCSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

RSINX
RSINX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
RSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
RSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCSAX vs. RSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) and Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCSAXRSINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.74

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

6.20

-0.30

SCSAX vs. RSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the RSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCSAX and RSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCSAXRSINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.26

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.49

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.55

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.40

0.00

Drawdowns

SCSAX vs. RSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCSAX drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, smaller than the maximum RSINX drawdown of -66.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCSAX and RSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCSAXRSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.49%

-66.11%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.68%

-8.64%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.64%

-20.23%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.46%

-23.08%

-15.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.63%

-40.86%

-4.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-1.74%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-10.56%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

2.42%

+1.19%

Volatility

SCSAX vs. RSINX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Victory RS Investors Fund (RSINX) at 2.66%. This indicates that SCSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCSAXRSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

2.66%

+3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.78%

8.29%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

11.93%

+6.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.84%

19.11%

+4.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.00%

19.10%

+4.90%

SCSAX vs. RSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCSAX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RSINX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCSAX vs. RSINX - Dividend Comparison

SCSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than RSINX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSINX
Victory RS Investors Fund
4.20%4.46%10.21%0.77%4.03%15.89%0.30%4.32%17.89%14.37%0.00%0.00%
SCSAX
Allspring Common Stock Fund
3.91%4.42%6.38%3.56%17.66%19.38%4.87%26.88%18.74%11.05%3.82%12.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCSAX and RSINX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCSAX has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to RSINX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCSAX dropped -53.49% vs RSINX's -66.11%.

RSINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCSAX and RSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer