PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCR.PA vs. MAP.MC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SCR.PA vs. MAP.MC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SCOR SE (SCR.PA) and Mapfre (MAP.MC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCR.PA achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly higher than MAP.MC's -1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SCR.PA has underperformed MAP.MC with an annualized return of 6.98%, while MAP.MC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.45% annualized return.


SCR.PA

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
14.88%
6M
21.75%
1Y
16.92%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
6.98%

MAP.MC

1D
1.98%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
-1.65%
6M
2.67%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
36.98%
5Y*
24.25%
10Y*
14.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCR.PA vs. MAP.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCR.PA
SCOR SE
14.88%30.06%-4.79%30.42%-16.21%11.10%-29.40%-0.53%23.23%7.02%
MAP.MC
Mapfre
-1.65%82.89%33.09%13.84%7.00%22.38%-27.04%7.69%-8.22%-2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SCR.PA and MAP.MC is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2006

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCR.PA vs. MAP.MC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCR.PA
SCR.PA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SCR.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCR.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCR.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SCR.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCR.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MAP.MC
MAP.MC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MAP.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCR.PA vs. MAP.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SCOR SE (SCR.PA) and Mapfre (MAP.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCR.PAMAP.MCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.79

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

4.69

-2.64

SCR.PA vs. MAP.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCR.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the MAP.MC Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCR.PA and MAP.MC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCR.PA vs. MAP.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCR.PA drawdown since its inception was -61.72%, roughly equal to the maximum MAP.MC drawdown of -63.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCR.PA and MAP.MC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCR.PAMAP.MCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.72%

-63.35%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.99%

-15.97%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.04%

-15.97%

-28.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.50%

-20.67%

-31.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.72%

-52.42%

-9.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.65%

-2.56%

-3.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.40%

-19.21%

+2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.02%

6.15%

+1.87%

Volatility

SCR.PA vs. MAP.MC - Volatility Comparison

SCOR SE (SCR.PA) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Mapfre (MAP.MC) at 5.52%. This indicates that SCR.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAP.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCR.PAMAP.MCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

5.52%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

17.13%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.41%

21.48%

+2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.63%

21.30%

+12.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.51%

25.17%

+8.34%

Dividends

SCR.PA vs. MAP.MC - Dividend Comparison

SCR.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than MAP.MC's 3.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAP.MC
Mapfre
3.88%3.90%5.15%6.09%6.82%7.53%8.57%6.20%6.30%5.46%4.23%6.06%
SCR.PA
SCOR SE
6.12%6.26%7.61%5.29%8.38%6.56%0.00%4.68%4.19%4.92%4.57%4.06%

Financials

SCR.PA vs. MAP.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SCOR SE and Mapfre. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SCR.PA and MAP.MC have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCR.PA and MAP.MC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer