SCQGX vs. SEMGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SCQGX (DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund) and SEMGX (DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - SCQGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by DWS, while SEMGX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by DWS. Over the past 10 years, SCQGX returned 15.50%/yr vs 7.33%/yr for SEMGX. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SCQGX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for SEMGX.

Performance

SCQGX vs. SEMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (SCQGX) and DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCQGX achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than SEMGX's 16.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SCQGX has outperformed SEMGX with an annualized return of 15.50%, while SEMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.33% annualized return.

SCQGX

• 1D: 2.76%
• 1M: -2.64%
• 6M: 2.56%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 1Y: 10.28%
• 3Y*: 18.12%
• 5Y*: 8.99%
• 10Y*: 15.50%
• ALL TIME*: 9.39%

SEMGX

• 1D: 3.04%
• 1M: -8.98%
• 6M: 4.78%
• YTD: 16.70%
• 1Y: 36.52%
• 3Y*: 17.01%
• 5Y*: 4.41%
• 10Y*: 7.33%
• ALL TIME*: 5.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCQGX DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SEMGX DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SCQGX vs. SEMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCQGX DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund	2.32%	15.68%	29.47%	41.14%	-33.56%	23.59%	40.77%	37.33%	-1.92%	25.13%
SEMGX DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund	16.70%	28.85%	7.48%	6.32%	-21.66%	-11.60%	18.65%	19.23%	-12.25%	37.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SCQGX and SEMGX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997	0.59

The correlation between SCQGX and SEMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCQGX vs. SEMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SCQGX

SCQGX Risk / Return Rank: 10
SCQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
SCQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SCQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
SCQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SCQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

SEMGX

SEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 46
SEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
SEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SCQGX vs. SEMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (SCQGX) and DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCQGX	SEMGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	1.28	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	1.71	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.25	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	1.82	-1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.37	6.27	-4.89

SCQGX vs. SEMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCQGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the SEMGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCQGX and SEMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCQGX vs. SEMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCQGX drawdown since its inception was -64.09%, roughly equal to the maximum SEMGX drawdown of -67.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCQGX and SEMGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCQGX	SEMGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.09%	-67.21%	+3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.77%	-17.84%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.77%	-18.37%	-5.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.69%	-37.63%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.69%	-45.82%	+8.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.84%	-15.34%	+7.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-25.15%	+6.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.66%	5.17%	+0.49%

Volatility

SCQGX vs. SEMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (SCQGX) is 5.47%, while DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) has a volatility of 11.21%. This indicates that SCQGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCQGX	SEMGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.47%	11.21%	-5.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.43%	23.16%	-7.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.99%	25.48%	-6.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.39%	19.90%	+2.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.17%	18.88%	+2.29%

SCQGX vs. SEMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCQGX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMGX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCQGX vs. SEMGX - Dividend Comparison

SCQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.18%, more than SEMGX's 2.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCQGX DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund	15.18%	15.53%	8.91%	1.75%	4.85%	8.53%	4.11%	5.59%	6.16%	3.68%	7.44%	15.37%
SEMGX DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund	2.57%	3.00%	0.15%	2.16%	2.16%	1.71%	1.23%	1.94%	0.71%	0.62%	0.54%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCQGX and SEMGX in my portfolio?

SCQGX and SEMGX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCQGX or SEMGX?

SEMGX has higher volatility (11.21%) compared to SCQGX (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCQGX dropped -64.09% vs SEMGX's -67.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.