SCQGX vs. SCGSX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SCQGX (DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund) and SCGSX (DWS Capital Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from DWS. Over the past 10 years, SCQGX returned 16.92%/yr vs 16.08%/yr for SCGSX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCQGX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SCGSX.

Performance

SCQGX vs. SCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (SCQGX) and DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCQGX achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly higher than SCGSX's 7.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCQGX having a 16.92% annualized return and SCGSX not far behind at 16.08%.

SCQGX

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 8.55%
• YTD: 10.98%
• 6M: 9.70%
• 1Y: 28.20%
• 3Y*: 23.69%
• 5Y*: 12.91%
• 10Y*: 16.92%

SCGSX

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 6.65%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 6.23%
• 1Y: 19.11%
• 3Y*: 20.21%
• 5Y*: 11.33%
• 10Y*: 16.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCQGX vs. SCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCQGX DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund	10.98%	15.68%	29.47%	41.14%	-33.56%	23.59%	40.77%	37.33%	-1.92%	25.13%
SCGSX DWS Capital Growth Fund	7.57%	12.34%	26.27%	38.61%	-30.88%	22.41%	38.60%	36.98%	-1.96%	26.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SCQGX and SCGSX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001	0.99

The correlation between SCQGX and SCGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SCQGX vs. SCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCQGX

SCQGX Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
SCQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SCQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
SCQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
SCQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

SCGSX

SCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 15
SCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
SCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
SCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
SCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCQGX vs. SCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (SCQGX) and DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCQGX	SCGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.28	+0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	1.80	+0.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.23	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	1.10	+0.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.73	3.59	+2.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCQGX vs. SCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCQGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the SCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCQGX and SCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCQGX	SCGSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	1.28	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.55	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.79	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.43	+0.06

Drawdowns

SCQGX vs. SCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCQGX drawdown since its inception was -64.09%, which is greater than SCGSX's maximum drawdown of -50.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCQGX and SCGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCQGX	SCGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.09%	-50.63%	-13.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.77%	-18.09%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.77%	-21.75%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.69%	-35.81%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.69%	-35.81%	-1.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.21%	-12.80%	-6.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.14%	5.56%	-0.42%

Volatility

SCQGX vs. SCGSX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (SCQGX) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to DWS Capital Growth Fund (SCGSX) at 3.55%. This indicates that SCQGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCQGX	SCGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	3.55%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.40%	12.28%	+1.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.07%	15.65%	+1.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.06%	20.82%	+1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.05%	20.48%	+0.57%

SCQGX vs. SCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCQGX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than SCGSX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCQGX vs. SCGSX - Dividend Comparison

SCQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.00%, more than SCGSX's 7.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCGSX DWS Capital Growth Fund	7.09%	7.62%	9.06%	7.18%	7.81%	6.64%	5.59%	5.98%	17.00%	9.08%	8.49%	11.02%
SCQGX DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund	14.00%	15.53%	8.91%	1.75%	4.85%	8.53%	4.11%	5.59%	6.16%	3.68%	7.44%	15.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCQGX and SCGSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, SCQGX and SCGSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCQGX or SCGSX?

SCQGX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to SCGSX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCQGX dropped -64.09% vs SCGSX's -50.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.