SCQGX vs. KTCAX
SCQGX (DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund) and KTCAX (DWS Science and Technology Fund) are both mutual funds - SCQGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by DWS, while KTCAX is a Technology Equities fund managed by DWS. Over the past 10 years, SCQGX returned 15.72%/yr vs 21.47%/yr for KTCAX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SCQGX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for KTCAX.
Performance
SCQGX vs. KTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCQGX achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly lower than KTCAX's 14.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SCQGX has underperformed KTCAX with an annualized return of 15.72%, while KTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.47% annualized return.
SCQGX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.43%
KTCAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- 6M
- 13.72%
- YTD
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 27.24%
- 3Y*
- 27.70%
- 5Y*
- 15.12%
- 10Y*
- 21.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SCQGX vs. KTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCQGX DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund | 3.45% | 15.68% | 29.47% | 41.14% | -33.56% | 23.59% | 40.77% | 37.33% | -1.92% | 25.13% |
KTCAX DWS Science and Technology Fund | 14.14% | 21.21% | 40.51% | 57.73% | -36.66% | 22.68% | 46.12% | 42.35% | -1.03% | 35.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCQGX and KTCAX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1992 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SCQGX and KTCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCQGX vs. KTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
SCQGX
KTCAX
SCQGX vs. KTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (SCQGX) and DWS Science and Technology Fund (KTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCQGX | KTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.18 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 1.48 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.58 | 4.19 | -2.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCQGX vs. KTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCQGX drawdown since its inception was -64.09%, smaller than the maximum KTCAX drawdown of -82.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCQGX and KTCAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCQGX | KTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.09% | -82.20% | +18.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.77% | -16.60% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -25.52% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.69% | -42.37% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.69% | -42.37% | +4.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.82% | -11.97% | +5.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -27.83% | +8.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | 5.84% | -0.16% |
Volatility
SCQGX vs. KTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (SCQGX) is 5.61%, while DWS Science and Technology Fund (KTCAX) has a volatility of 9.72%. This indicates that SCQGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCQGX | KTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 9.72% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.47% | 21.32% | -5.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 25.33% | -6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 25.80% | -3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 24.46% | -3.29% |
SCQGX vs. KTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCQGX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than KTCAX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCQGX vs. KTCAX - Dividend Comparison
SCQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.02%, more than KTCAX's 7.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTCAX DWS Science and Technology Fund | 7.29% | 8.32% | 10.15% | 11.73% | 6.31% | 10.93% | 7.36% | 8.99% | 14.35% | 4.50% | 2.32% | 11.97% |
SCQGX DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund | 15.02% | 15.53% | 8.91% | 1.75% | 4.85% | 8.53% | 4.11% | 5.59% | 6.16% | 3.68% | 7.44% | 15.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SCQGX and KTCAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
KTCAX has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to SCQGX (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCQGX dropped -64.09% vs KTCAX's -82.20%.
KTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCQGX and KTCAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer