SCPZX vs. UMBHX
SCPZX (Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - SCPZX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Carillon Family of Funds, while UMBHX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Carillon Family of Funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCPZX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
SCPZX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCPZX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.88%
- 10Y*
- 2.87%
UMBHX
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCPZX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCPZX Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund | -0.01% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | -1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCPZX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCPZX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
SCPZX
UMBHX
SCPZX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund (SCPZX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCPZX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.49 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCPZX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | -20.59 | +20.93 |
Drawdowns
SCPZX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCPZX drawdown since its inception was -28.85%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCPZX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCPZX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.85% | -1.86% | -26.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -1.86% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.75% | -1.26% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | — | — |
Volatility
SCPZX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCPZX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12% | 6.22% | -2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.56% | 6.22% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.60% | 6.22% | -0.62% |
SCPZX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCPZX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCPZX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
SCPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCPZX Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund | 4.24% | 4.35% | 4.70% | 4.31% | 3.06% | 1.27% | 5.79% | 4.47% | 2.26% | 1.76% | 3.92% | 2.89% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SCPZX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for SCPZX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer