SCPZX vs. JHNBX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SCPZX (Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund) and JHNBX (John Hancock Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, SCPZX returned 2.87%/yr vs 2.22%/yr for JHNBX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCPZX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for JHNBX.

Performance

SCPZX vs. JHNBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund (SCPZX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCPZX achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly higher than JHNBX's 0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SCPZX has outperformed JHNBX with an annualized return of 2.87%, while JHNBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.

SCPZX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 0.81%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 4.51%
• 5Y*: 0.88%
• 10Y*: 2.87%

JHNBX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: 0.62%
• 1Y: 5.95%
• 3Y*: 4.51%
• 5Y*: 0.06%
• 10Y*: 2.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCPZX vs. JHNBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCPZX Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund	0.81%	8.68%	1.34%	6.27%	-11.79%	-1.96%	16.56%	8.30%	0.76%	3.51%
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund	0.39%	7.53%	1.97%	6.24%	-15.22%	-0.68%	10.31%	10.09%	-1.15%	4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SCPZX and JHNBX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997	0.84

The correlation between SCPZX and JHNBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SCPZX vs. JHNBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCPZX

SCPZX Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
SCPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
SCPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
SCPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SCPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

JHNBX

JHNBX Risk / Return Rank: 23
JHNBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
JHNBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
JHNBX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
JHNBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
JHNBX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCPZX vs. JHNBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund (SCPZX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCPZX	JHNBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.42	+0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	2.11	+0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.25	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	1.92	+0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.37	5.93	+1.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCPZX vs. JHNBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCPZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the JHNBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCPZX and JHNBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCPZX	JHNBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	1.42	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.01	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.45	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.75	-0.41

Drawdowns

SCPZX vs. JHNBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCPZX drawdown since its inception was -28.85%, which is greater than JHNBX's maximum drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCPZX and JHNBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCPZX	JHNBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.85%	-24.74%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.91%	-3.25%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.72%	-6.69%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.39%	-20.13%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.38%	-20.13%	+1.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.32%	-2.00%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-4.15%	+0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	1.05%	-0.19%

Volatility

SCPZX vs. JHNBX - Volatility Comparison

Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund (SCPZX) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) at 1.41%. This indicates that SCPZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHNBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCPZX	JHNBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.57%	1.41%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.03%	2.94%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.12%	4.00%	+0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.56%	5.87%	+0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.60%	4.92%	+0.68%

SCPZX vs. JHNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCPZX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than JHNBX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCPZX vs. JHNBX - Dividend Comparison

SCPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than JHNBX's 4.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund	4.47%	4.41%	4.14%	3.80%	2.93%	3.30%	5.50%	3.75%	3.51%	3.23%	3.19%	3.48%
SCPZX Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund	4.24%	4.35%	4.70%	4.31%	3.06%	1.27%	5.79%	4.47%	2.26%	1.76%	3.92%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCPZX and JHNBX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SCPZX and JHNBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCPZX or JHNBX?

SCPZX has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to JHNBX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCPZX dropped -28.85% vs JHNBX's -24.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCPZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.