SCOP vs. SETM
SCOP (Sprott Physical Copper Trust) and SETM (Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCOP is a Commodities fund actively managed by Sprott, while SETM is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross. SCOP is actively managed, while SETM is passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCOP charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SETM.
Performance
SCOP vs. SETM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCOP
- 1D
- -6.13%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETM
- 1D
- -10.18%
- 1M
- -14.27%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 17.08%
- 1Y
- 102.31%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCOP vs. SETM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | 2.27% |
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | -9.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCOP and SETM is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCOP vs. SETM — Risk / Return Rank
SCOP
SETM
SCOP vs. SETM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Copper Trust (SCOP) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCOP | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.47 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
SCOP vs. SETM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCOP drawdown since its inception was -11.09%, smaller than the maximum SETM drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOP and SETM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCOP | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -42.81% | +31.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.72% | -18.05% | +8.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -14.26% | +9.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.41% | — |
Volatility
SCOP vs. SETM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCOP | SETM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.24% | 45.87% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.24% | 36.97% | +8.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.24% | 36.97% | +8.27% |
SCOP vs. SETM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCOP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SETM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCOP vs. SETM - Dividend Comparison
SCOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 1.39% | 1.56% | 2.07% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCOP and SETM have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SETM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SETM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SCOP.
SETM has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for SCOP.
SCOP is categorized as Commodities, while SETM is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SCOP and 0.65% for SETM.
Find the right allocation for SCOP and SETM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer