PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCOP vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCOP vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Copper Trust (SCOP) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SCOP

1D
-6.13%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
-2.47%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
36.99%
6M
33.63%
1Y
43.72%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
14.82%
10Y*
7.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCOP vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCOP and GSG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCOP vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCOP

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCOP vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Copper Trust (SCOP) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCOP vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCOPGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

-0.09

+0.72

Drawdowns

SCOP vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCOP drawdown since its inception was -11.09%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOP and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCOPGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.09%

-89.62%

+78.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.72%

-58.64%

+48.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-63.71%

+59.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

Volatility

SCOP vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCOPGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.24%

23.15%

+22.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.24%

22.63%

+22.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.24%

22.04%

+23.20%

SCOP vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCOP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCOP vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither SCOP nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SCOP and GSG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SCOP.

SCOP and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Sprott and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SCOP and 0.75% for GSG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCOP and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer