SCOP vs. COPX
SCOP (Sprott Physical Copper Trust) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both Copper funds. SCOP is actively managed, while COPX is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCOP charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
SCOP vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCOP
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -13.86%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 73.61%
- 3Y*
- 28.94%
- 5Y*
- 17.82%
- 10Y*
- 20.20%
SCOP vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | -3.17% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | -3.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCOP and COPX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCOP vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
SCOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COPX
SCOP vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Copper Trust (SCOP) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCOP | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCOP vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCOP drawdown since its inception was -13.22%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOP and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCOP | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.22% | -83.16% | +69.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.09% | -20.40% | +9.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.54% | -39.23% | +32.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.39% | — |
Volatility
SCOP vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCOP | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.87% | 44.69% | -3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.87% | 37.08% | +3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.87% | 35.74% | +5.13% |
SCOP vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCOP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCOP vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
SCOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.20% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCOP and COPX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SCOP.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.00% for SCOP.
They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SCOP and 0.65% for COPX.
Find the right allocation for SCOP and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer