SCOP vs. COM
SCOP (Sprott Physical Copper Trust) and COM (Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF) are both Commodities funds. SCOP is actively managed, while COM is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCOP charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for COM.
Performance
SCOP vs. COM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCOP
- 1D
- -6.13%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COM
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- 6.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- —
SCOP vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | 2.27% |
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | -3.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCOP and COM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCOP vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank
SCOP
COM
SCOP vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Copper Trust (SCOP) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCOP | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.70 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SCOP vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCOP drawdown since its inception was -11.09%, smaller than the maximum COM drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCOP and COM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCOP | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -15.95% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.72% | -6.21% | -3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -6.28% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility
SCOP vs. COM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCOP | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.24% | 10.50% | +34.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.24% | 9.60% | +35.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.24% | 9.78% | +35.46% |
SCOP vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCOP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCOP vs. COM - Dividend Comparison
SCOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.50% | 2.99% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 8.59% | 10.32% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 2.36% | 0.09% |
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCOP and COM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COM is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COM is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SCOP.
COM has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.00% for SCOP.
They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SCOP and 0.70% for COM.
Find the right allocation for SCOP and COM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer