SCO vs. USOI
SCO (ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil) and USOI (Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN) are both Oil & Gas funds - SCO tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%) while USOI tracks the Credit Suisse NASDAQ WTI Crude Oil FLOWS 106 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SCO returned -58.66% vs 25.08% for USOI. Their -0.92 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SCO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for USOI.
Performance
SCO vs. USOI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCO achieves a -65.39% return, which is significantly lower than USOI's 32.59% return.
SCO
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -23.78%
- 6M
- -55.81%
- YTD
- -65.39%
- 1Y
- -58.66%
- 3Y*
- -29.81%
- 5Y*
- -39.67%
- 10Y*
- -40.39%
- ALL TIME*
- -26.09%
USOI
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 23.29%
- YTD
- 32.59%
- 1Y
- 25.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $131.70M | $126.01M | $253.57M | |
| $32.75M | $18.81M | $9.02M |
SCO vs. USOI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | -65.39% | 15.90% | -0.29% |
USOI Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN | 32.59% | -8.78% | 3.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCO and USOI is -0.91, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2024 | -0.92 |
The correlation between SCO and USOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.92 to -0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCO vs. USOI — Risk / Return Rank
SCO
USOI
SCO vs. USOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCO | USOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.17 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 0.96 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 3.00 | -4.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCO vs. USOI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than USOI's maximum drawdown of -23.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and USOI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCO | USOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -23.54% | -76.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.24% | -23.54% | -48.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.77% | -14.63% | -85.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.28% | -7.85% | -77.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.39% | 8.10% | +34.29% |
Volatility
SCO vs. USOI - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) has a higher volatility of 23.27% compared to Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN (USOI) at 6.18%. This indicates that SCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCO | USOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.27% | 6.18% | +17.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.24% | 20.39% | +30.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.66% | 24.74% | +34.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.43% | 23.32% | +37.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.89% | 23.32% | +48.57% |
SCO vs. USOI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than USOI's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCO vs. USOI - Dividend Comparison
SCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USOI Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETN | 46.43% | 27.21% | 12.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCO and USOI have a correlation of -0.91, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCO has higher volatility (23.27%) compared to USOI (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCO dropped -99.80% vs USOI's -23.54%.
On 1-year performance, USOI leads with 25.08% vs -58.66% for SCO. On fees, USOI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, USOI has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USOI has performed better with a 25.08% return vs -58.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USOI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCO.
USOI has the higher dividend yield at 46.43%, compared with 0.00% for SCO.
SCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%), while USOI tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ WTI Crude Oil FLOWS 106 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCO and 0.85% for USOI.
USOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCO and USOI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer