PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCMC vs. VGMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCMC vs. VGMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF (SCMC) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCMC achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than VGMS's 1.29% return.


SCMC

1D
0.08%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGMS

1D
0.23%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCMC vs. VGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SCMC and VGMS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCMC vs. VGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Multi-Strategy Income ETF (SCMC) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCMC vs. VGMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCMCVGMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

2.18

-0.86

Drawdowns

SCMC vs. VGMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCMC drawdown since its inception was -1.91%, smaller than the maximum VGMS drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMC and VGMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCMCVGMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-2.46%

+0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.16%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-0.31%

-0.05%

Volatility

SCMC vs. VGMS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCMCVGMSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83%

3.21%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.83%

3.21%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.83%

3.21%

-0.38%

SCMC vs. VGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCMC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VGMS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCMC vs. VGMS - Dividend Comparison

SCMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than VGMS's 5.15% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCMC and VGMS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGMS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGMS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SCMC.

VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 2.17% for SCMC.

They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SCMC and 0.30% for VGMS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCMC and VGMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer