SCMB vs. RVNU
SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) and RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - SCMB tracks the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross while RVNU tracks the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCMB returned 3.37%/yr vs 3.65%/yr for RVNU. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCMB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for RVNU.
Performance
SCMB vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCMB achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 3.71% return.
SCMB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RVNU
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
SCMB vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 1.07% | 3.78% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 3.05% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.71% | 0.58% | 1.46% | 11.19% | 1.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCMB and RVNU is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCMB and RVNU has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCMB vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank
SCMB
RVNU
SCMB vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCMB | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.36 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 3.92 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | 11.69 | -3.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCMB | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.89 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.39 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
SCMB vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCMB drawdown since its inception was -6.13%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMB and RVNU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCMB | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.13% | -23.51% | +17.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -2.46% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.57% | -10.35% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -2.80% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -4.98% | +3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 0.83% | +0.04% |
Volatility
SCMB vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) is 1.04%, while Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that SCMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVNU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCMB | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 1.42% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.17% | 3.41% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94% | 5.12% | -2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 7.19% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 7.27% | -3.11% |
SCMB vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCMB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCMB vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison
SCMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, which matches RVNU's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.52% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.54% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCMB and RVNU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RVNU has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to SCMB (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMB dropped -6.13% vs RVNU's -23.51%.
On 3-year performance, RVNU leads with 3.65% vs 3.37% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RVNU has performed better with a 3.65% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for RVNU.
SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 3.52% for RVNU.
SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCMB and 0.15% for RVNU.
SCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCMB and RVNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer